...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Neuropharmacology >Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Improve the Dysfunction of Descending Pain Modulatory System Related to Opioids in Chronic Non-cancer Pain: An Integrative Review of Neurobiology and Meta-Analysis
【24h】

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Improve the Dysfunction of Descending Pain Modulatory System Related to Opioids in Chronic Non-cancer Pain: An Integrative Review of Neurobiology and Meta-Analysis

机译:经颅直流电刺激改善慢性非癌性疼痛中与阿片类药物相关的降压调节系统功能障碍:神经生物学和荟萃分析的综合综述

获取原文

摘要

Background: Opioid long-term therapy can produce tolerance, opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH), and it induces dysfunction in pain descending pain inhibitory system (DPIS). Objectives: This integrative review with meta-analysis aimed: (i) To discuss the potential mechanisms involved in analgesic tolerance and opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH). (ii) To examine how the opioid can affect the function of DPIS. (ii) To show evidence about the tDCS as an approach to treat acute and chronic pain. (iii) To discuss the effect of tDCS on DPIS and how it can counter-regulate the OIH. (iv) To draw perspectives for the future about the tDCS effects as an approach to improve the dysfunction in the DPIS in chronic non-cancer pain. Methods: Relevant published randomized clinical trials (RCT) comparing active (irrespective of the stimulation protocol) to sham tDCS for treating chronic non-cancer pain were identified, and risk of bias was assessed. tDCS protocols accepted were application in areas of the primary motor cortex (M1), dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) or occipital region. The primary outcome: pain intensity on Visual Analogue-Scale (0-10). Results: Fifty-nine studies were fully reviewed, and 24 with moderate to the high-quality methodology were included. tDCS improved chronic pain with a moderate effect size [pooled standardized mean difference; -0.66; 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.91 to -0.41]. On average, active protocols led to 27.26% less pain at the end of treatment compared to sham [95% CI; 15.89% to 32.90%]. Protocol varied in terms of anodal or cathodal stimulation, areas of stimulation (M1 and DLPFC the most common), number of sessions (from 5 to 20) and current intensity (from 1mA to 2mA). The time of application was 20 min in 92% of protocols. Conclusion: In comparison with sham stimulation, tDCS demonstrated a superior effect in reducing pain in chronic pain conditions. They give perspectives that the top-down neuromodulator effects of tDCS are a promising approach to improve management in refractory chronic not-cancer related pain and to enhance dysfunctional neuronal circuitries involved in the DPIS and other pain dimensions and improve pain control with a therapeutic opioid-free. However, further studies are needed to determine individualized protocols according to a biopsychosocial perspective.
机译:背景:阿片类药物的长期治疗可产生耐受性,阿片类药物引起的痛觉过敏(OIH),并在疼痛下降疼痛抑制系统(DPIS)中诱发功能障碍。目标:这项带有荟萃分析的综合综述旨在:(i)讨论止痛耐受性和阿片类药物引起的痛觉过敏(OIH)的潜在机制。 (ii)研究阿片类药物如何影响DPIS的功能。 (ii)显示有关tDCS作为治疗急性和慢性疼痛的方法的证据。 (iii)讨论tDCS对DPIS的影响以及它如何反监管OIH。 (iv)就tDCS效应提出未来的观点,以改善慢性非癌性疼痛中DPIS的功能障碍。方法:确定相关公开的随机临床试验(RCT),该试验比较了主动治疗(无论刺激方案如何)与假tDCS治疗慢性非癌性疼痛,并评估了偏倚风险。公认的tDCS协议适用于主要运动皮层(M1),背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)或枕骨区域。主要结果:视觉模拟量表(0-10)上的疼痛强度。结果:对59项研究进行了全面审查,其中包括24项中等至高质量方法。 tDCS改善了慢性疼痛,并具有中等程度的疗效[合并的标准化均值差; -0.66; 95%置信区间(CI)-0.91至-0.41]。平均而言,积极的治疗方案与假手术相比,治疗结束时的疼痛减轻了27.26%[95%CI; 15.89%至32.90%]。协议在阳极或阴极刺激,刺激区域(M1和DLPFC最常见),疗程数(从5到20)和电流强度(从1mA到2mA)方面有所不同。在92%的方案中,应用时间为20分钟。结论:与假刺激相比,tDCS在减轻慢性疼痛条件下的疼痛方面表现出更好的效果。他们认为,tDCS的自上而下的神经调节作用是改善难治性慢性非癌相关性疼痛的管理方法,并增强与DPIS和其他疼痛有关的功能障碍的神经元回路,并通过治疗性阿片类药物改善疼痛控制的有前途的方法。自由。但是,需要进一步的研究,以根据生物心理社会的角度确定个性化的方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号