首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience >Evidence for a Priori Existence of Attentional Bias Subgroups in Emotional Processing of Aversive Stimuli
【24h】

Evidence for a Priori Existence of Attentional Bias Subgroups in Emotional Processing of Aversive Stimuli

机译:厌恶刺激的情感加工中注意偏见亚群的先验存在的证据。

获取原文
       

摘要

Little is known regarding inter-individual differences in attentional biases for pain-related information; more knowledge is crucial, since these biases have been associated with differences in pain processing as well as in predicting the risk of postoperative pain. The present study investigated EEG correlates of attentional bias patterns for pain-related information, with specific focus on avoidance- and vigilance-like behavior. Forty-one participants performed a dot-probe task, where neutral and pain-related words were used to create neutral, congruent, incongruent, and double (two pain-related words) trials. EEG was recorded, which was used to generate ERP's of the word-processing phase and the post-dot phase. Participants were placed in two subgroups based on the direction of their attentional bias (either positive; toward the pain-related words, or negative; away from pain-related words). Using t-profiles, four latency windows were identified on which the two subgroups differed significantly. These latency windows yield areas which correspond with the P1-N1 domain and the P3b for the word-processing phase, while the post-dot phase latency windows cover the areas of the P200 and the P3b. The two subgroups show differences on congruent, incongruent, and the double trials, but interestingly also on the neutral trials. Most notably, the area in the word-phase associated with the P3b is diminished in the subgroup showing a negative bias. The deflections associated with both early and late attentional components, including the P3B, as well as a positive deflection in the timeframe of proposed response evaluation processes differ significantly between subgroups. In this study we demonstrated that different attentional biases exist in the healthy population, by showing differences in ERP's. We also show differences in processing neutral trials, which suggests there are fundamental differences between these groups in processing words in general.
机译:关于疼痛相关信息的注意偏见之间的个体差异知之甚少;由于这些偏见与疼痛处理的差异以及预测术后疼痛的风险有关,因此更多的知识至关重要。本研究调查了与疼痛有关的信息的注意偏见模式与脑电图的相关性,尤其侧重于避免和警惕性行为。 41名参与者执行了一个点探针任务,其中使用中性和与疼痛相关的单词来进行中性,全等,不一致和两次(两个与疼痛相关的单词)试验。记录了脑电图,用于生成文字处理阶段和点后阶段的ERP。根据参与者的注意力偏向的方向将他们分为两个亚组(积极的;朝向与疼痛有关的单词;反之,远离与疼痛有关的单词)。使用t-profiles,确定了四个潜伏期窗口,两个子组在这些潜伏期上明显不同。这些等待时间窗口产生的区域与字处理阶段的P1-N1域和P3b相对应,而点后阶段的等待时间窗口覆盖P200和P3b的区域。这两个亚组在同等,不一致和双重试验中显示出差异,但有趣的是,在中性试验中也存在差异。最值得注意的是,与P3b相关的字相区域在显示负偏压的子组中减小了。与早期和晚期注意力成分(包括P3B)相关的偏斜以及拟议的响应评估过程在时间范围内的正偏斜在子组之间存在显着差异。在这项研究中,我们通过显示ERP的差异证明了健康人群中存在不同的注意偏见。我们还显示了在处理中性试验时的差异,这表明这些组在处理单词方面总体上存在根本差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号