首页> 外文期刊>Global spine journal. >The Application of the Revised Condyle–C1 Interval Method to Diagnose Traumatic Atlanto-occipital Dissociation in Adults
【24h】

The Application of the Revised Condyle–C1 Interval Method to Diagnose Traumatic Atlanto-occipital Dissociation in Adults

机译:改良的Con突-C1间隔方法在成人创伤性寰枕分离中的应用

获取原文
           

摘要

Study Design Retrospective study. Objective Traumatic atlanto-occipital dissociation (AOD) remains a diagnostic challenge, and delay in diagnosis is associated with catastrophic outcomes. Recently, a revised version of the condyl–C1 interval (CCI) utilizing parasagittal computed tomography (CT) reconstruction was used successfully with unilateral dislocation of 2.5?mm at the level of that joint diagnostic of AOD. We report the utility of this simple technique in the diagnosis of six patients with AOD. Methods Two blinded neurosurgeons assessed CTs of six patients with AOD and 30 patients without AOD. The following methodologies were applied: basion–dens interval (BDI), basion–axial interval (BAI), Lee X-lines, Powers ratio, CCI, and revised CCI. The average sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) as well as the kappa statistic indicating interrater reliability of each method were investigated. Results The average sensitivity for BDI, BAI, Lee X-lines, Power ratio, CCI, and revised CCI was 0.75, 0.33, 0.67, 0.50, 1.00, and 1.00, respectively. The average specificity was 1.00, 1.00, 0.50, 1.00, 0.94, and 1.00, respectively. The average PPV was 1.00, 1.00, 0.25, 1.00, 0.80, and 1.00, respectively. The average NPV was 0.96, 0.88, 0.89, 0.91, 1.00, and 1.00, respectively, and the kappa statistic was 0.57, 0.25, 0.25, 0.20, 1.00, and 1.00, respectively. Conclusion Based on this study, the revised CCI method is simple yet the most sensitive and reliable technique for the diagnosis of AOD.
机译:研究设计回顾性研究。目的创伤性寰枕分离(AOD)仍然是一项诊断挑战,诊断延迟与灾难性后果相关。最近,使用矢状面计算机断层扫描(CT)重建的condyl-C1间隔(CCI)修订版已成功用于单侧脱位2.5?mm的AOD联合诊断水平。我们报告了此简单技术在诊断6例AOD患者中的实用性。方法两名盲神经外科医生评估了6例AOD患者和30例非AOD患者的CT。应用了以下方法:基坑密度间隔(BDI),基坑轴向间隔(BAI),Lee X线,幂比,CCI和修订的CCI。研究了每种方法的平均灵敏度,特异性,阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)以及卡帕统计数据,这些数据表明了不同方法之间的可靠性。结果BDI,BAI,Lee X线,功率比,CCI和修正的CCI的平均灵敏度分别为0.75、0.33、0.67、0.50、1.00和1.00。平均特异性分别为1.00、1.00、0.50、1.00、0.94和1.00。平均PPV分别为1.00、1.00、0.25、1.00、0.80和1.00。平均NPV分别为0.96、0.88、0.89、0.91、1.00和1.00,kappa统计量分别为0.57、0.25、0.25、0.20、1.00和1.00。结论基于这项研究,修订后的CCI方法简便易行,但却是诊断AOD的最灵敏,最可靠的技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号