首页> 外文期刊>Evolutionary Psychology >Distinguishing Byproducts from Non-Adaptive Effects of Algorithmic Adaptations:
【24h】

Distinguishing Byproducts from Non-Adaptive Effects of Algorithmic Adaptations:

机译:从算法适应的非适应性效应中区分副产物:

获取原文
           

摘要

I evaluate the use of the byproduct concept in psychology, particularly the adaptation-byproduct distinction that is commonly invoked in discussions of psychological phenomena. This distinction can be problematic when investigating algorithmic mechanisms and their effects, because although all byproducts may be functionless concomitants of adaptations, not all incidental effects of algorithmic adaptations are byproducts (although they have sometimes been labeled as such). I call attention to Sperber's (1994) distinction between proper domains and actual domains of algorithmic mechanisms. Extending Sperber's distinction, I propose the terms adaptive effects and non-adaptive effects, which more accurately capture the phenomena of interest to psychologists and prevent fruitless adaptation-versus-byproduct debates.
机译:我评估了副产品概念在心理学中的用途,尤其是在心理现象的讨论中通常援引的适应性副产品区别。在研究算法机制及其效果时,这种区分可能会引起问题,因为尽管所有副产品可能都是适应的伴随功能,但并非算法适应的所有附带效应都是副产品(尽管有时有时会标出副产品)。我提请注意Sperber(1994)在算法机制的适当领域和实际领域之间的区别。为了扩展Sperber的区别,我提出了自适应效应和非自适应效应这两个术语,它们可以更准确地捕获心理学家感兴趣的现象,并防止毫无结果的适应与副产品的争论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号