首页> 外文期刊>Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia >The analgesic efficacy of continuous fascia iliaca block vs. continuous psoas compartment block after hip surgery: A comparative study
【24h】

The analgesic efficacy of continuous fascia iliaca block vs. continuous psoas compartment block after hip surgery: A comparative study

机译:髋关节手术后连续fa肌筋膜阻滞与连续腰肌隔室阻滞的镇痛效果:一项比较研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Both psoas compartment block and fascia iliaca compartment block have been shown to be reliable blocks for postoperative pain relief for procedures involving the hip joint. This study evaluated the efficacy of continuous psoas compartment block with continuous fascia iliaca block for postoperative analgesia after hip surgery. Methods In randomized blinded study Forty, ASA I–III patients aged 30–75 years, with BMI less than 40, scheduled for hip surgery, were divided to one of two groups. Group P: continuous psoas compartment block ( n = 18) and group F: continuous fascia iliaca block ( n = 19). Standard general anesthesia was induced after finishing the block technique. After recovery 30 ml of 0.125% levobupivacaine was injected through the catheter to all patients. Postoperative 24 h meperidine consumption, patient satisfaction, visual analogue scale pain scores at (1, 6, 12, 18, and 24 h) postoperative, postoperative hemodynamics (HR and MAp), evidence of sensory and motor blockades, and incidence of adverse effects were recorded. Results There was no significant difference between the two groups in 24 h postoperative meperidine requirements, postoperative VAS, patient satisfaction, postoperative hemodynamics, and distribution of sensory and motor block of (femoral, lateral femoral cutaneous, and obturator nerves). The epidural anesthesia occurred in two patients in psoas group (11%). Conclusion Both continuous fascia iliaca block and continuous psoas compartment block were comparable in providing safe and effective analgesia after hip surgery.
机译:背景技术腰大肌室阻滞和fa肌筋膜室阻滞均已被证明是用于髋关节手术后疼痛缓解的可靠阻滞。这项研究评估了连续腰肌隔室阻滞与连续fa肌阻滞对髋部手术后镇痛的疗效。方法在随机盲研究40中,计划进行髋关节手术的30岁至75岁,BMI小于40岁的ASA I–III患者分为两组。 P组:连续性腰肌室阻滞(n = 18),F组:连续性筋膜fa肌阻滞(n = 19)。阻滞技术完成后,进行标准全身麻醉。康复后,通过导管向所有患者注射30 ml 0.125%左旋布比卡因。术后24小时服用甲哌丁啶,患者满意度,术后(1、6、12、18和24 h)视觉模拟量表疼痛评分,术后血流动力学(HR和MAp),感觉和运动阻滞的证据以及不良反应的发生率被记录。结果两组在术后24h的哌替啶需求量,术后VAS,患者满意度,术后血流动力学以及感觉和运动阻滞(股,股外侧皮和闭孔神经)分布方面无显着差异。腰大肌组中有2例患者发生了硬膜外麻醉(11%)。结论连续hip肌筋膜阻滞和连续腰肌隔室阻滞在髋关节手术后提供安全有效的镇痛方面具有可比性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号