...
首页> 外文期刊>Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia >Effect of nalbuphine as an adjuvant on levobupivacaine induced caudal analgesia in children undergoing surgical procedures, controlled randomized double blinded study
【24h】

Effect of nalbuphine as an adjuvant on levobupivacaine induced caudal analgesia in children undergoing surgical procedures, controlled randomized double blinded study

机译:纳布啡作为佐剂对左布比卡因引起的外科手术患儿镇痛的作用,随机双盲对照研究

获取原文

摘要

Background To reduce intraoperative use of volatile anesthetics, a successful caudal blockade affords the anesthesiologist this opportunity. The use of a narcotic-sparing approach may benefit the patient, with providing a better postoperative course with less nausea. Aim of the work To compare the effects of plain levobupivacaine 0.25% 1 ml/kg and levobupivacaine 0.25% 1 ml/kg plus nalbuphine 0.1 mg/kg single-shot caudal epidural for perioperative pain relief in children undergoing surgeries of lower half of the body. Patients and methods The study was conducted in Abou El-Reesh pediatric hospital, Cairo University, after approval of ethical committee and obtaining consent from parents on 40 patient aged 1–9 years scheduled for surgeries of lower half of the body. (Group L, n = 20): Caudal block was done in this group using levobupivacaine 0.25% with the dose of 1 ml/kg after induction of general anesthesia. (Group L + N, n = 20): Caudal block was done in this group using levobupivacaine 0.25% with the dose of 1 ml/kg and nalbuphine 0.1 mg/kg after induction of general anesthesia. Results The time to first analgesia was significantly longer in Group L + N ( P 0.01) than that in the other group. The mean time for first rescue analgesia was 5.9 ± 1.0 h in Group L compared to that in Group L + N, which was 11.2 ± 1.6 h. Comparing the pain scores (AIIMS pain score) of the two groups at 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24 h postoperatively revealed that there was significant difference between Group L + N and Group L at 4, 6 and 12 h with higher pain scores in the (Group L) than in the other Group (L + N). This shows that the duration of analgesia in the (L + N) group was longer than the other group. The results show there was difference in the sedation score between the two groups in the 1st hour postoperative. The L + N group had higher sedation scores at 30 min and at 1 h postoperative. Conclusion Caudal epidural nalbuphine is safe in pediatric surgeries including the lower half of the body and effectively reduces postoperative pain. However it may cause early postoperative sedation, yet without respiratory depression.
机译:背景技术为了减少术中挥发性麻醉剂的使用,成功的尾巴阻滞为麻醉师提供了这一机会。使用麻醉剂保存方法可以使患者受益,并提供更好的术后病程和更少的恶心。工作目的为了比较接受下半身手术的儿童围手术期疼痛,普通左旋布比卡因0.25%1 ml / kg和左旋布比卡因0.25%1 ml / kg加纳布啡0.1 mg / kg尾c硬膜外硬膜外阻滞的效果。患者和方法本研究是在伦理委员会批准并获得父母同意后,在开罗大学阿布埃里斯儿科医院进行的,该患者计划对40名1至9岁的患者进行下半身手术。 (L组,n = 20):在该组中,在全身麻醉诱导后使用0.25%左旋布比卡因以1ml / kg的剂量进行尾巴阻滞。 (L + N组,n = 20):该组在全身麻醉诱导后使用0.25%左旋布比卡因,1ml / kg的剂量和0.1mg / kg的纳布啡进行尾巴阻滞。结果L + N组首次镇痛时间明显长于其他组(P <0.01)。 L组首次急诊镇痛的平均时间为5.9±1.0 h,而L + N组为11.2±1.6 h。比较两组在术后2、4、6、12和24 h的疼痛评分(AIIMS疼痛评分),发现L + N组和L组在4、6和12 h时有显着差异,且疼痛评分更高(L组)中的内容比其他L(N + N)中的内容多。这表明(L + N)组的镇痛持续时间长于另一组。结果显示,术后1小时内两组的镇静分数存在差异。 L + N组在术后30分钟和术后1小时镇静评分较高。结论尾硬膜外纳布啡在包括下半部在内的儿科手术中是安全的,可有效减轻术后疼痛。但是,它可能会导致术后早期镇静,而不会引起呼吸抑制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号