...
首页> 外文期刊>Educational research in medical sciences >Comparison between the Effect of Lecture and Question - answer Methods on Learning Outcome and Satisfaction of Physiology Course among Medical and Pharmacy Students
【24h】

Comparison between the Effect of Lecture and Question - answer Methods on Learning Outcome and Satisfaction of Physiology Course among Medical and Pharmacy Students

机译:讲座和问答方式对药学和药学专业学生学习结果和生理课程满意度的影响比较。

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: Considering the efficiency of active teaching methods, current study is designed to compare the effect of lecture and question-answer methods on learning outcome and satisfaction of physiology course among medical and pharmacy students. Methods: In this semi-experimental study, medical and pharmacy students which have been registered in physiology course, divided randomly into two groups. Some topics of physiology with the same content were taught for both groups. The difference was that in the test group, question-answer method was used. In the next meeting, test and control groups were displaced and the same test was performed for all students at the end of each session. Totally, 8 sessions run in this way and the average test scores in two groups were compared. We used a questionnaire to compare the student opinion about these two methods. Content validity of the questionnaire was determined and its reliability was calculated by using Cronbach's alpha. Results: The results showed that the mean percentage of correct answers to final exam questions in test groups of medical (78 ± 2.06%) and pharmacy students (55.02 ± 3.89%) was significantly greater than control groups (65 ± 2.64%, 42.41 ± 3.22% respectively) with P value of 0.0001 and 0.018, respectively. More than 90% of students preferred this method to the traditional method. Conclusion: Our findings showed that using simple active question-answer method would increase students’ satisfaction and learning outcome at physiology course. Thus, we recommend using of this method for education of other basic science courses. Keywords: Lecture, Teaching Methods, Medical students, Pharmacy students.
机译:简介:考虑到主动教学方法的效率,本研究旨在比较授课和问答方法对医学和药学专业学生学习成果和生理学课程满意度的影响。方法:在这项半实验研究中,已在生理学课程中注册的医学和药学专业的学生随机分为两组。两组都教授了一些具有相同内容的生理学主题。不同之处在于在测试组中使用了问答方法。在下一次会议上,测试和对照组被置换,并且在每节课结束时对所有学生进行了相同的测试。总共以这种方式进行了8次训练,并比较了两组的平均考试成绩。我们使用问卷调查表比较了学生对这两种方法的看法。确定了问卷的内容效度,并使用Cronbach's alpha计算了信度。结果:结果表明,医学(278±2.06%)和药学学生(55.02±3.89%)的测试组中,期末考试答对的正确答案的平均百分比显着高于对照组(65±2.64%,42.41± P值分别为0.0001和0.018。超过90%的学生比传统方法更喜欢这种方法。结论:我们的研究结果表明,使用简单的主动问答方法可以提高学生在生理学课程中的满意度和学习成果。因此,我们建议将此方法用于其他基础科学课程的教育。关键字:讲座,教学方法,医学生,药学生。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号