...
首页> 外文期刊>Iranian Journal of Radiology >ULTRASOUND-GUIDED FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION CYTOLOGY IN THE ASSESSMENT OF CERVICAL METASTASIS IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING ELECTIVE NECK DISSECTION
【24h】

ULTRASOUND-GUIDED FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION CYTOLOGY IN THE ASSESSMENT OF CERVICAL METASTASIS IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING ELECTIVE NECK DISSECTION

机译:超声引导下细针吸取细胞学检查在评估颈淋巴结转移的患者中的价值

获取原文

摘要

Background: In head and neck cancer patients, diagnosis of metastatic cervical adenopathy is essential for treatment planning and prognosis assessment. Treatment of patients with head and neck cancer with clinically negative cervical lymph node (N0) remains controversial. While routine neck treatment would result in overtreatment in many patients, observation may delay the diagnosis and decrease the patients’ survival. Objectives: To gain insights into the unclear questions regarding the value of diagnostic modalities in patients with N0 neck, this study was designed to compare the diagnostic efficacy of palpation, ultrasonography (US) and ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (USGFNA) in detecting cervical lymph node metastasis.Patients and Methods: Forty-two patients with head and neck cancer who underwent US and USGFNA prior to elective neck dissection were studied. Histopathologic findings of the neck specimens were compared with each diagnostic technique.Results: Of the 53 neck dissection specimens, histopathology showed metastases in 16 cases. The overall accuracy of USGFNA, US and palpation was 96%, 68% and 70%, respectively. The specificity of USGFNA was superior to palpation and US alone. USGFNA had the highest sensitivity, predictive value and accuracy in detecting cervical metastases compared with other performed tests. Conclusions: In our study, USGFNA was superior to palpation and US in detecting metastasis in clinically negative necks. This method can be recommended as a diagnostic tool in preoperative assessment of patients without palpable metastasis, but further investigations are needed before this modality could be considered as an alternative to elective neck dissection.
机译:背景:在头颈癌患者中,转移性宫颈腺病的诊断对于治疗计划和预后评估至关重要。临床上阴性的颈部淋巴结(N0)治疗头颈癌患者仍存在争议。虽然常规的颈部治疗会导致许多患者过度治疗,但观察可能会延迟诊断并降低患者的生存率。目的:为了深入了解有关N0颈部患者诊断方式价值的不清楚问题,本研究旨在比较触诊,超声检查(US)和超声引导下细针穿刺术(USGFNA)在检测宫颈癌中的诊断功效。病人和方法:研究了42例头颈癌患者,在行选择性颈清扫术前行了US和USGFNA检查。结果:在53例颈淋巴结清扫标本中,有16例发生了转移。 USGFNA,US和触诊的总体准确性分别为96%,68%和70%。 USGFNA的特异性优于触诊和仅美国。与其他进行的检查相比,USGFNA在检测宫颈转移中具有最高的敏感性,预测价值和准确性。结论:在我们的研究中,USGFNA在检测临床阴性颈部转移方面优于触诊和US。该方法可推荐作为术前评估无明显转移的患者的诊断工具,但在将该方法视为选择性颈部清扫术的替代方法之前,还需要进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号