首页> 外文期刊>Ecology and Evolution >Large-scale dark diversity estimates: new perspectives with combined methods
【24h】

Large-scale dark diversity estimates: new perspectives with combined methods

机译:大规模黑暗多样性估计:组合方法的新观点

获取原文

摘要

Abstract Large-scale biodiversity studies can be more informative if observed diversity in a study site is accompanied by dark diversity, the set of absent although ecologically suitable species. Dark diversity methodology is still being developed and a comparison of different approaches is needed. We used plant data at two different scales (European and seven large regions) and compared dark diversity estimates from two mathematical methods: species co-occurrence (SCO) and species distribution modeling (SDM). We used plant distribution data from the Atlas Florae Europaeae (50 ???? 50 km grid cells) and seven different European regions (10 ???? 10 km grid cells). Dark diversity was estimated by SCO and SDM for both datasets. We examined the relationship between the dark diversity sizes (type II regression) and the overlap in species composition (overlap coefficient). We tested the overlap probability according to the hypergeometric distribution. We combined the estimates of the two methods to determine consensus dark diversity and composite dark diversity. We tested whether dark diversity and completeness of site diversity (log ratio of observed and dark diversity) are related to various natural and anthropogenic factors differently than simple observed diversity. Both methods provided similar dark diversity sizes and distribution patterns; dark diversity is greater in southern Europe. The regression line, however, deviated from a 1:1 relationship. The species composition overlap of two methods was about 75%, which is much greater than expected by chance. Both consensus and composite dark diversity estimates showed similar distribution patterns. Both dark diversity and completeness measures exhibit relationships to natural and anthropogenic factors different than those exhibited by observed richness. In summary, dark diversity revealed new biodiversity patterns which were not evident when only observed diversity was examined. A new perspective in dark diversity studies can incorporate a combination of methods.
机译:摘要如果在研究地点观察到的多样性伴随着黑暗的多样性,则该大规模的生物多样性研究可能会提供更多信息。黑暗多样性方法仍在开发中,需要对不同方法进行比较。我们使用了两个不同规模(欧洲和七个大区域)的植物数据,并比较了两种数学方法的暗度多样性估计:物种共现(SCO)和物种分布模型(SDM)。我们使用了Atlas Florae Europaeae(50 ???? 50 km网格单元)和七个不同的欧洲地区(10 ???? 10 km网格单元)的植物分布数据。 SCO和SDM估计了两个数据集的暗分集。我们研究了黑暗多样性大小(II型回归)与物种组成重叠(重叠系数)之间的关系。我们根据超几何分布测试了重叠概率。我们结合了两种方法的估计,以确定共识暗分集和复合暗分集。我们测试了暗态多样性和位点多样性的完整性(实测和暗态多样性的对数比)是否与简单的观测到的多样性与各种自然和人为因素相关。两种方法都提供了相似的暗分集大小和分布模式。南欧的黑暗多样性更大。但是,回归线偏离了1:1关系。两种方法的物种组成重叠约为75%,这比偶然预期的要大得多。共识和综合暗分集估计都显示出相似的分布模式。黑暗多样性和完整性测度均显示出与自然和人为因素的关系,与所观察到的丰富度所显示的因素不同。总而言之,黑暗的多样性揭示了新的生物多样性模式,当仅检查观察到的多样性时,这种模式是不明显的。黑暗多样性研究的新观点可以结合多种方法。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号