首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Qualitative Methods >Varieties of a??Sociological Enlightenmenta??: Critical Arts-Based Inquiry Versus German Reconstructive Social Research
【24h】

Varieties of a??Sociological Enlightenmenta??: Critical Arts-Based Inquiry Versus German Reconstructive Social Research

机译:“社会学启蒙运动”的种类:基于批评艺术的研究与德国重建社会研究

获取原文
           

摘要

This article is a methodological reflection on recent developments in qualitative research. It discusses the methodology of critical arts-based qualitative inquiry (CAI).Since the 1980s and in postmodern, poststructural or postpositivist approaches CAI is seen as a renewal of qualitative research. Though, apart from special discourses in Cultural Studies, CAI seems to be ignored by German sociology. I will focus on the theoretical-methodological fundamentals of these approaches with respect to a politics of interpretation, and discuss these basics from the perspective of German qualitative-reconstructive research traditions. Although CAI can be a source of productive irritations, the differences suggest contrasting concepts of a a??sociological enlightenment.a??
机译:本文是对定性研究最新发展的方法论反思。它讨论了基于批判性艺术的定性探究(CAI)的方法。自1980年代以来,在后现代,后结构或后实证主义方法中,CAI被视为定性研究的更新。但是,除了文化研究中的特殊论述外,CAI似乎被德国社会学所忽略。在解释政治学方面,我将重点介绍这些方法的理论方法论基础,并从德国定性-重构研究传统的角度讨论这些基础。尽管CAI可能是产生生产性烦恼的源头,但这些差异暗示了a ??社会学启蒙的反差概念。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号