首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Business and Management >Technology Strategy and Firm’s Revenue Growth: Empirical Evidence of Malaysian Industrial Automation Industry
【24h】

Technology Strategy and Firm’s Revenue Growth: Empirical Evidence of Malaysian Industrial Automation Industry

机译:技术战略与企业收入增长:马来西亚工业自动化行业的经验证据

获取原文
       

摘要

Technology strategy was found by many researchers as a way to improve competitiveness. Failure to develop and integrate technology strategy and business strategy is a major contributing factor to the decline of firm’s competitiveness. Many literatures also indicated that technology strategy played an important role in determining firm performance in technology-driven industries such as industrial automation company. However, most of the previous studies have generally focused on the structure-conduct-performance theory which emphasized greatly on external factors (i.e market condition and competitors) to link strategies to firm performance. Very few studies were found to link strategies with the internal factors. Thus, the present study was undertaken to relate strategic view and resource-base view theory to the firm performance of industrial automation company looking at technology selection, technology competence, technology posture and the moderating effect of the resource deployment. The empirical result based on 61 Malaysian industrial automation company found that, technology selection has positive impact towards revenue growth (measuring firm’s performance). However, technology posture was found to be a negative predictor towards revenue growth and technology competence has no significant impact on revenue growth. Resource deployment on the other hand was identified to only moderate technology selection and technology posture but not technology competence.
机译:许多研究人员发现技术策略可以提高竞争力。无法制定和整合技术策略和业务策略是导致公司竞争力下降的主要因素。许多文献还表明,技术战略在决定技术驱动型行业(如工业自动化公司)的公司绩效中起着重要作用。但是,以前的大多数研究通常都集中于结构-行为-绩效理论,该理论极大地强调了将战略与公司绩效联系起来的外部因素(即市场条件和竞争者)。很少有研究将策略与内部因素联系起来。因此,本研究旨在将战略观点和资源基础观点理论与工业自动化公司的企业绩效联系起来,从技术选择,技术能力,技术态势和资源配置的调节效果两方面进行探讨。基于61家马来西亚工业自动化公司的实证结果发现,技术选择对收入增长(衡量公司的业绩)具有积极影响。但是,发现技术状况对收入增长具有负面影响,技术能力对收入增长没有重大影响。另一方面,确定资源部署仅适度地选择技术和技术状态,而不能适应技术能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号