首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease >Preference for different relaxation techniques by COPD patients: comparison between six techniques
【24h】

Preference for different relaxation techniques by COPD patients: comparison between six techniques

机译:COPD患者首选不同的放松技术:六种技术之间的比较

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: A review of the effectiveness of relaxation techniques for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients has shown inconsistent results, but studies have varied in terms of technique and outcome measures. Aim: To determine patient preference for different relaxation techniques. Methods: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients were presented with six techniques via a DVD and asked to rate the techniques in terms of effectiveness, rank in order of likely use, and comment. Results: Patients differed in the technique preferred and reason for that preference, but the most commonly preferred technique both for effectiveness and ease of use was “thinking of a nice place” followed by progressive relaxation and counting. Familiarity and ease of activity were commonly given reasons for preference. Conclusion: Rather than providing patients with a single technique that they might find difficult to implement, these results suggest that it would be better to give a choice. “Thinking of a nice place” is a popular but under-investigated technique.
机译:背景:对放松技术对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的有效性的审查显示出不一致的结果,但是研究在技术和结果测量方面有所不同。目的:确定患者对不同放松技术的偏好。方法:通过DVD向慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者提供了六种技术,并要求他们对这些技术的有效性,可能使用的顺序和评论进行评分。结果:患者对首选技术和偏好的原因有所不同,但就有效性和易用性而言,最常用的首选技术是“思考一个好地方”,然后逐步放松并计数。熟悉和易于活动通常是人们偏爱的原因。结论:与其为患者提供可能难以实施的单一技术,不如说这些结果表明做出选择会更好。 “想一个好地方”是一种流行的但研究不足的技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号