...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Exercise Science >Running Economy While Running in Shoes Categorized as Maximal Cushioning
【24h】

Running Economy While Running in Shoes Categorized as Maximal Cushioning

机译:跑步时的经济运行被归类为最大缓冲

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

International Journal of Exercise Science 11(2): 1031-1040, 2018. The purpose of the study was to determine if running economy was influenced by wearing maximal cushioning shoes vs. control (neutral cushioning) shoes. Participants (n=10, age=28.2±6.1yrs; mass=68.1±10.2 kg; height=170±6.1 cm) completed two experiments. Each experiment included running conditions wearing control and maximal cushioning shoes. In Experiment 1, participants ran on a treadmill at three speeds in each shoe condition (6 total conditions). The speeds were: 1) preferred speed, 2) preferred speed + 0.447 m·s-1, and 3) preferred speed - 0.447 m·s-1. In Experiment 2, participants ran on a treadmill at two inclines (0%, 6%) in each shoe condition (4 total conditions) at preferred speed. Experiments were conducted on separate days with Experiment 1 first. For all conditions, participants ran for 8-10 minutes while rate of oxygen consumption (VO2) was recorded. Average VO2 during steady state for each running condition was calculated. For Experiment 1, a 2 (shoe) x 3 (speed) repeated measures ANOVA (α=0.05) was used. For Experiment 2, a 2 (shoe) x 2 (incline) repeated measures ANOVA (α=0.05) was used. Rate of oxygen consumption was not influenced by the interaction of speed and shoe (p=0.108); VO2 was different between speeds (p0.001), but not between shoes (p=0.071). Rate of oxygen consumption was not influenced by the interaction of incline and shoe (p=0.191); VO2 was greater for incline vs. level (p0.001), but not different between shoes (p=0.095). It is concluded that a maximal cushioning running shoe did not influence running economy when compared to a control shoe (neutral cushioning running shoe).
机译:International Journal of Exercise Science 11(2):1031-1040,2018年。研究的目的是确定跑步的经济性是否受穿着最大的缓震鞋与控制(中性缓震)鞋的影响。参加者(n = 10,年龄= 28.2±6.1yrs;质量= 68.1±10.2 kg;身高= 170±6.1 cm)完成了两个实验。每个实验都包括跑步条件,穿着控制和最大的缓震鞋。在实验1中,参与者在每种鞋状况(总共6种状况)下以三种速度在跑步机上跑步。速度为:1)优选速度,2)优选速度+ 0.447m·s-1,和3)优选速度-0.447m·s-1。在实验2中,参与者在每种鞋子状况(总共4种状况)下以优选速度在两个倾斜度(0%,6%)的跑步机上跑步。在不同的日期进行实验,首先进行实验1。在所有条件下,参与者奔跑8-10分钟,同时记录耗氧率(VO2)。计算了每种运行条件下稳态下的平均VO2。对于实验1,使用2(鞋)×3(速度)重复测量ANOVA(α= 0.05)。对于实验2,使用2(鞋)×2(斜面)重复测量ANOVA(α= 0.05)。耗氧率不受速度和鞋子相互作用的影响(p = 0.108);速度之间的VO2不同(p <0.001),但鞋子之间无差异(p = 0.071)。氧气消耗率不受坡度与鞋子相互作用的影响(p = 0.191);相对于水平,VO2更大(p <0.001),但鞋子之间无差异(p = 0.095)。结论是,与控制鞋(中性减震跑鞋)相比,最大的减震跑鞋不会影响跑步的经济性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号