首页> 外文期刊>Journal of science and medicine in sport >Rocker shoe, minimalist shoe, and standard running shoe: A comparison of running economy
【24h】

Rocker shoe, minimalist shoe, and standard running shoe: A comparison of running economy

机译:跷板鞋,极简主义鞋和标准跑鞋:跑步经济性的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: Running with rocker shoes is believed to prevent lower limb injuries. However, it is not clear how running in these shoes affects the energy expenditure. The purpose of this study was, therefore, to assess the effects of rocker shoes on running economy in comparison with standard and minimalist running shoes. Design: Cross-over design. Methods: Eighteen endurance female runners (age = 23.6 ± 3 years), who were inexperienced in running with rocker shoes and with minimalist/barefoot running, participated in this study. Oxygen consumption, carbon dioxide production, heart rate and rate of perceived exertion were measured while participants completed a 6-min sub-maximal treadmill running test for each footwear condition. The data of the last 2. min of each shoe condition were averaged for analysis. A linear mixed model was used to compare differences among three footwear conditions. Results: Oxygen consumption during running with rocker shoes was on average 4.5% higher than with the standard shoes (p< 0.001) and 5.6% higher than with the minimalist shoe (p< 0.001). No significant differences were found in heart rate and rate of perceived exertion across three shoe conditions. Conclusions: Female runners, who are not experienced in running with the rocker shoes and minimalist shoes, show more energy expenditure during running with the rocker shoes compared with the standard and minimalist shoes. As the studied shoes were of different masses, part of the effect of increased energy expenditure with the rocker shoe is likely to be due to its larger mass as compared with standard running shoes and minimalist shoes.
机译:目标:相信使用摇杆鞋跑步可以防止下肢受伤。但是,尚不清楚这些鞋子的跑动如何影响能量消耗。因此,本研究的目的是与标准和极简跑鞋相比,评估摇杆鞋对跑步经济性的影响。设计:交叉设计。方法:18名耐力女运动员(年龄= 23.6±3岁)参加了本次研究,他们没有用过摇杆鞋和极简/赤脚跑步的经验。在参与者针对每种鞋类状况完成了6分钟的次最大跑步机跑步测试的同时,测量了氧气消耗,二氧化碳的产生,心率和感觉到的劳累率。将每种鞋状况的最后2分钟的数据取平均值进行分析。使用线性混合模型比较三种鞋类条件之间的差异。结果:摇杆鞋在跑步过程中的耗氧量比标准鞋平均高4.5%(p <0.001),而简约鞋则高5.6%(p <0.001)。在三种鞋况下,心率和感知劳累率均无显着差异。结论:与标准鞋和极简主义运动鞋相比,没有使用过跷板鞋和极简主义运动鞋的女性跑步者表现出更多的能量消耗。由于所研究的鞋子质量不同,因此与标准跑鞋和极简主义鞋子相比,翘板鞋增加能量消耗的部分原因可能是其重量更大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号