...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity >Understanding breast cancer patients' preference for two types of exercise training during chemotherapy in an unblinded randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Understanding breast cancer patients' preference for two types of exercise training during chemotherapy in an unblinded randomized controlled trial

机译:在一项无盲的随机对照试验中了解乳腺癌患者在化疗期间对两种运动训练的偏好

获取原文

摘要

Background Patient preference for group assignment may affect outcomes in unblinded trials but few studies have attempted to understand such preferences. The purpose of the present study was to examine factors associated with breast cancer patients' preference for two types of exercise training during chemotherapy. Methods Breast cancer patients (N = 242) completed a battery of tests including a questionnaire that assessed patient preference and the theory of planned behavior (TPB) prior to being randomized to usual care, resistance exercise training (RET), or aerobic exercise training (AET). Results 99 (40.9%) participants preferred RET, 88 (36.4%) preferred AET, and 55 (22.7%) reported no preference. Past exercisers (p = 0.023), smokers (p = 0.004), and aerobically fitter participants (p = 0.005) were more likely to prefer RET. As hypothesized, participants that preferred AET had more favorable TPB beliefs about AET whereas participants that preferred RET had more favorable TPB beliefs about RET. In multivariate modeling, patient preference for RET versus AET was explained (R2 = .46; p < 0.001) by the difference in motivation for RET versus AET (β = .56; p < 0.001), smoking status (β = .13; p = 0.007), and aerobic fitness (β = .12; p = 0.018). Motivational difference between RET versus AET, in turn, was explained (R2 = .48; p < 0.001) by differences in instrumental attitude (β = .27; p < 0.001), affective attitude (β = .25; p < 0.001), and perceived behavioral control (β = .24; p < 0.001). Conclusion Breast cancer patients' preference for RET versus AET during chemotherapy was predicted largely by a difference in motivation for each type of exercise which, in turn, was based on differences in their beliefs about the anticipated benefits, enjoyment, and difficulty of performing each type of exercise during chemotherapy. These findings may help explain patient preference effects in unblinded behavioral trials. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT00115713.
机译:背景患者对小组分配的偏好可能会影响非盲试验的结果,但很少有研究试图了解这种偏好。本研究的目的是检查与乳腺癌患者在化疗期间偏爱两种运动训练相关的因素。方法乳腺癌患者(N = 242)完成了一系列测试,其中包括对患者的偏爱和计划行为理论(TPB)进行评估的问卷,然后将其随机分为常规护理,抵抗运动训练(RET)或有氧运动训练( AET)。结果99(40.9%)名参与者更喜欢RET,88(36.4%)名参与者更喜欢AET,而55(22.7%)名参与者没有偏好。既往运动者(p = 0.023),吸烟者(p = 0.004)和有氧运动参与者(p = 0.005)更可能喜欢RET。如假设的那样,偏好AET的参与者对AET的TPB信念更满意,而偏好RET的参与者对RET的TPB信念更满意。在多变量建模中,通过RET与AET的动机差异(β= .56; p <0.001),吸烟状态(β= .13; R = 0.26; p <0.001)来解释患者对RET与AET的偏爱(R2 = .46; p <0.001)。 p = 0.007)和有氧适应度(β= 0.12; p = 0.018)。依次通过工具态度的差异(β= .27; p <0.001),情感态度(β= .25; p <0.001)解释了RET与AET的动机差异(R2 = .48; p <0.001)。和感知的行为控制(β= 0.24; p <0.001)。结论乳腺癌患者在化疗期间对RET与AET的偏爱很大程度上是由每种运动动机的差异来预测的,而这种运动又是基于他们对每种类型的预期收益,享受和难度的信念不同化疗期间的运动。这些发现可能有助于解释无盲行为试验中患者的偏爱效果。试用注册ClinicalTrials.gov标识符NCT00115713。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号