Comparison of Empiric Isolation and Conventional Isolation of Superior Vena Cava in Addition to Pulmonary Vein Isolation on the Outcome of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

摘要

Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) in the treatment of AF is currently based on pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Some studies have investigated the efficacy of empiric SVC isolation (SVCI) in addition to conventional PVI in order to improve success rates and reduce recurrence rates. However, the results of the studies have given conflicting data.We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the empiric SVCI compared with conventional SVCI for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) ablation.We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Web of Science, and the Cochrane Database from the period January 1986 to August 2016 and identified qualified studies. The primary clinical outcome was the recurrence rate of atrial tachyarrhythmias, and the secondary clinical outcomes were procedure time, fluoroscopy time, and complications.We identified 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and one nonrandomized, observational study (nROS) involving 245 patients with empiric SVCI and 269 patients with conventional SVCI. The empiric SVCI group had a lower recurrence rate of atrial tachyarrhythmia after a single procedure compared with the conventional SVCI group (16.7% versus 29.4%, OR: 0.48, 95%CI: 0.31 to 0.74, P = 0.0009). There was no significant difference in fluoroscopic time ( P = 0.22), procedure time ( P = 0.32), or clinical complications ( P = 0.33) between the two groups.Empiric SVCI is more effective than conventional SVCI in terms of the long-term outcomes of PAF patients after a single PVI procedure, with the same fluoroscopic time, procedure time, and clinical complications.