首页> 外文期刊>Indian Journal of Surgery >Postoperative pain relief following abdominal operations: A prospective randomised study of comparison of patient controlled analgesia with conventional parenteral opioids
【24h】

Postoperative pain relief following abdominal operations: A prospective randomised study of comparison of patient controlled analgesia with conventional parenteral opioids

机译:腹部手术后的术后疼痛缓解:前瞻性随机对照比较患者自控镇痛与常规肠胃外阿片类药物

获取原文
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Parenteral opioids are traditionally used for pain management following abdominal operations. Patient Controlled Analgesia (PCA) is replacing the conventional method for postoperative pain relief nowadays. AIMS: To find out the effectiveness of PCA in postoperative pain relief following abdominal operations. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This prospective randomised study was conducted in the Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Pondicherry, India. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-two consecutive patients undergoing abdominal operations were randomly divided into PCA group (n=32) who received intravenous PCA morphine and IM group (n=30) who received conventional intramuscular morphine in the postoperative period. Morphine consumption, pain relief, detailed pulmonary function tests and side-effects of morphine were assessed. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: This was performed by "Epi Info 2000 version 6". Chi-square and Students 't' tests were used to relate the variables. RESULTS: The total morphine consumption of the PCA group was significantly lesser than IM group (mean 30.84 mg versus 37.36 mg P-0.015) and it was less at different intervals in the postoperative period. The PCA group had better pain relief when compared to the IM group (mean pain score 3.42 versus 4.97 P<0.001). Pulmonary function parameters did not show a significant difference at different intervals in the postoperative period except for Peak Expiratory Flow Rate. None of the patients had major morphine-related complications. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous PCA provides better pain relief with less morphine consumption as compared to the conventional IM method. Recovery of postoperative pulmonary functions showed no significant difference in the two groups apart from Peak Expiratory Flow Rate, which showed significant early recovery in the PCA group.
机译:背景:胃肠外阿片类药物传统上用于腹部手术后的疼痛处理。如今,患者自控镇痛(PCA)替代了常规的术后疼痛缓解方法。目的:探讨PCA在腹部手术后缓解疼痛的有效性。地点和设计:这项前瞻性随机研究是在印度庞地契里的贾瓦哈拉尔研究生医学教育和研究学院进行的。材料与方法:将62例接受腹部手术的患者随机分为术后阶段接受PCA吗啡静脉注射的PCA组(n = 32)和接受常规肌内吗啡注射的IM组(n = 30)。评估了吗啡的消耗量,疼痛缓解,详细的肺功能检查和吗啡的副作用。统计分析:这是由“ Epi Info 2000版本6”执行的。卡方检验和St​​udent't'检验用于关联变量。结果:PCA组的总吗啡消耗量显着低于IM组(分别为30.84 mg和37.36 mg P-0.015),并且在术后不同时间段均较少。与IM组相比,PCA组的疼痛缓解效果更好(平均疼痛评分3.42对4.97 P <0.001)。除峰值呼气流速外,肺功能参数在术后不同时间间隔无明显差异。所有患者均无与吗啡有关的重大并发症。结论:与传统的IM方法相比,静脉PCA可提供更好的止痛效果,且吗啡的消耗量更少。两组的术后肺功能恢复无显着差异,除最大呼气流速峰值外,PCA组的早期恢复显着。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号