首页> 外文期刊>Indian journal of nephrology >Comparison of serum creatinine-based estimating equations with gates protocol for predicting glomerular filtration rate in indian population
【24h】

Comparison of serum creatinine-based estimating equations with gates protocol for predicting glomerular filtration rate in indian population

机译:盖茨协议基于血清肌酐的估计方程与印度人群肾小球滤过率预测的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

In clinical practice, serum creatinine-based predicting equations and Gates protocol based on gamma camera imaging of kidneys after injection of Tc99m-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) are commonly used to assess glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Comparison of these methods, especially the chronic kidney disease-epidemiology collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation with gold standard method of assessment of GFR by plasma clearance of Tc-99mDTPA is not well-studied in Indian population. We conducted this study to compare GFR estimation by gamma camera-based Gates protocol and serum creatinine-based predicting equations with GFR measured by plasma clearance of Tc-99mDTPA. One hundred and five patients (65 male and 40 female) underwent Tc-99m DTPA renal scan followed by withdrawal of venous blood samples at 2, 3, and 4 h as per predefined protocol. Gates method GFR (GFRs) was assessed using standard protocol. GFR by plasma sampling (GFRp) was calculated by slope-intercept method with provision for corrections. Estimated GFR was calculated by Cockroft-Gault formula, four variable modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) equation, and CKD-EPI equation (GFRCG, GFRMDRD, GFRCKD-EPI, respectively). GFR measured by gold standard method (GFRp) was compared with that estimated by other methods by calculating correlation coefficient, bias, precision, and accuracy. GFR estimated by all three estimating equations correlated better than GFRs with GFRp. For estimating GFRp, GFRCKD-EPI had highest correlation with GFRp with least bias and highest precision. Gamma camera-based Gates protocol was the least precise and least accurate method for estimating GFRp. To conclude, all three estimating equations based on serum creatinine are superior to Tc-99m DTPA scintigraphy for estimating GFR; CKD-EPI equation being the most accurate and precise. Key words: Chronic kidney disease-epidemiology collaboration equation, diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid renogram, estimated glomerular filtration rate, measured glomerular filtration rate
机译:在临床实践中,注射Tc99m-二亚乙基三胺五乙酸(DTPA)后,基于血清肌酐的预测方程式和基于对肾脏的伽马相机成像的Gates协议通常用于评估肾小球滤过率(GFR)。这些方法,尤其是慢性肾脏病-流行病学协作(CKD-EPI)方程与通过Tc-99mDTPA血浆清除率评估GFR的金标准方法的比较在印度人群中并未得到很好的研究。我们进行了这项研究,以比较通过基于Gamma相机的Gates协议的GFR估算值和基于血清肌酐的预测方程式,以及通过Tc-99mDTPA的血浆清除率测量的GFR。根据预定方案,对105例患者(男65例,女40例)进行了Tc-99m DTPA肾脏扫描,然后在第2、3和4 h抽取静脉血样本。盖茨方法的GFR(GFR s )使用标准方案进行评估。血浆采样的GFR(GFR p )是通过斜率截距法计算的,并提供了校正方法。通过Cockroft-Gault公式,肾脏疾病饮食的四个变量修改(MDRD)方程和CKD-EPI方程(GFR CG, GFR MDRD ,GFR CKD-EPI )。通过计算相关系数,偏差,精度和准确性,将通过金标准方法(GFR p )测量的GFR与通过其他方法估算的GFR进行了比较。这三个估计方程式估计的GFR均比GFR s 和GFR p更好。对于估计GFR p ,GFR CKD-EPI < / sub>与GFR p 的相关性最高,偏差最小,精度最高。基于伽马相机的盖茨协议是估计GFR p 的最不精确和最不精确的方法。总而言之,基于血清肌酐的所有三个估算方程式在估算GFR方面均优于Tc-99m DTPA闪烁显像法。 CKD-EPI方程最精确。关键词:慢性肾脏病-流行病学协作方程,二亚乙基三胺五乙酸肾图,估计的肾小球滤过率,实测的肾小球滤过率

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号