...
首页> 外文期刊>Implementation Science >The evaluation of enhanced feedback interventions to reduce unnecessary blood transfusions (AFFINITIE): protocol for two linked cluster randomised factorial controlled trials
【24h】

The evaluation of enhanced feedback interventions to reduce unnecessary blood transfusions (AFFINITIE): protocol for two linked cluster randomised factorial controlled trials

机译:评估增强反馈干预措施以减少不必要的输血(AFFINITIE):两项链接的集群随机析因对照试验的方案

获取原文
           

摘要

BackgroundBlood for transfusion is a frequently used clinical intervention, and is also a costly and limited resource with risks. Many transfusions are given to stable and non-bleeding patients despite no clear evidence of benefit from clinical studies. Audit and feedback (A&F) is widely used to improve the quality of healthcare, including appropriate use of blood. However, its effects are often inconsistent, indicating the need for coordinated research including more head-to-head trials comparing different ways of delivering feedback. A programmatic series of research projects, termed the ‘ A udit and F eedback IN terventions to I ncrease evidence-based T ransfusion practIcE’ (AFFINITIE) programme, aims to test different ways of developing and delivering feedback within an existing national audit structure. MethodsThe evaluation will comprise two linked 2×2 factorial, cross-sectional cluster-randomised controlled trials. Each trial will estimate the effects of two feedback interventions, ‘enhanced content’ and ‘enhanced follow-on support’, designed in earlier stages of the AFFINITIE programme, compared to current practice. The interventions will be embedded within two rounds of the UK National Comparative Audit of Blood Transfusion (NCABT) focusing on patient blood management in surgery and use of blood transfusions in patients with haematological malignancies. The unit of randomisation will be National Health Service (NHS) trust or health board. Clusters providing care relevant to the audit topics will be randomised following each baseline audit (separately for each trial), with stratification for size (volume of blood transfusions) and region (Regional Transfusion Committee). The primary outcome for each topic will be the proportion of patients receiving a transfusion coded as unnecessary. For each audit topic a linked, mixed-method fidelity assessment and cost-effectiveness analysis will be conducted in parallel to the trial. DiscussionAFFINITIE involves a series of studies to explore how A&F may be refined to change practice including two cluster randomised trials linked to national audits of transfusion practice. The methodology represents a step-wise increment in study design to more fully evaluate the effects of two enhanced feedback interventions on patient- and trust-level clinical, cost, safety and process outcomes. Trial registration http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN15490813
机译:背景技术输血是一种常用的临床干预手段,也是一种昂贵且风险有限的资源。尽管尚无明确证据表明可从临床研究中获益,但仍向稳定且无出血的患者进行了许多输血。审计和反馈(A&F)被广泛用于改善医疗质量,包括适当使用血液。但是,其效果通常不一致,这表明需要进行协调研究,包括进行更多的头对头试验,以比较不同的反馈方式。一系列计划性研究项目,称为“提高循证输血实践的审计和反馈”(AFFINITIE)计划,旨在测试在现有国家审核架构中开发和提供反馈意见的不同方式。方法该评估将包括两个链接的2×2因式,横截面聚类随机对照试验。与目前的做法相比,每项试验都将评估在AFFINITIE计划的早期阶段设计的“增强内容”和“增强后续支持”这两种反馈干预措施的效果。这些干预措施将被纳入英国国家输血比较审核(NCABT)的两轮中,重点关注手术中的患者血液管理以及血液系统恶性肿瘤患者的输血使用。随机单位将是国家卫生服务(NHS)信托或卫生委员会。在每次基线审核后(针对每个试验),将与审核主题相关的护理分组随机化(针对每个试验),并按规模(输血量)和地区(地区输血委员会)进行分层。每个主题的主要结果将是接受编码为不必要的输血的患者比例。对于每个审核主题,将在试验的同时进行链接的混合方法保真度评估和成本效益分析。讨论AFFINITIE涉及一系列研究,以探索如何完善A&F以改变实践,包括两项与国家输血实践审核相关的整群随机试验。该方法代表了研究设计中的逐步增加,以便更全面地评估两种增强的反馈干预对患者和信任级临床,成本,安全性和过程结果的影响。试用注册http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN15490813

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号