首页> 外文期刊>Implementation Science >Evaluating an audit and feedback intervention for reducing antibiotic prescribing behaviour in general dental practice (the RAPiD trial): a partial factorial cluster randomised trial protocol
【24h】

Evaluating an audit and feedback intervention for reducing antibiotic prescribing behaviour in general dental practice (the RAPiD trial): a partial factorial cluster randomised trial protocol

机译:评估审核和反馈干预措施以减少一般牙科实践中的抗生素开处方行为(RAPiD试验):部分因子集群随机试验方案

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Antibiotic prescribing in dentistry accounts for 9% of total antibiotic prescriptions in Scottish primary care. The Scottish Dental Clinical Effectiveness Programme (SDCEP) published guidance in April 2008 (2nd edition, August 2011) for Drug Prescribing in Dentistry, which aims to assist dentists to make evidence-based antibiotic prescribing decisions. However, wide variation in prescribing persists and the overall use of antibiotics is increasing. Methods RAPiD is a 12-month partial factorial cluster randomised trial conducted in NHS General Dental Practices across Scotland. Its aim is to compare the effectiveness of individualised audit and feedback (A&F) strategies for the translation into practice of SDCEP recommendations on antibiotic prescribing. The trial uses routinely collected electronic healthcare data in five aspects of its design in order to: identify the study population; apply eligibility criteria; carry out stratified randomisation; generate the trial intervention; analyse trial outcomes. Eligibility was determined on contract status and a minimum level of recent NHS treatment provision. All eligible dental practices in Scotland were simultaneously randomised at baseline either to current audit practice or to an intervention group. Randomisation was stratified by single-handed/multi-handed practices. General dental practitioners (GDPs) working at intervention practices will receive individualised graphical representations of their antibiotic prescribing rate from the previous 14 months at baseline and an update at six months. GDPs could not be blinded to their practice allocation. Intervention practices were further randomised using a factorial design to receive feedback with or without: a health board comparator; a supplementary text-based intervention; additional feedback at nine months. The primary outcome is the total antibiotic prescribing rate per 100 courses of treatment over the year following delivery of the baseline intervention. A concurrent qualitative process evaluation will apply theory-based approaches using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to explore the acceptability of the interventions and the Theoretical Domains Framework to identify barriers and enablers to evidence-based antibiotic prescribing behaviour by GDPs. Discussion RAPiD will provide a robust evaluation of A&F in dentistry in Scotland. It also demonstrates that linked administrative datasets have the potential to be used efficiently and effectively across all stages of an randomised controlled trial. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN49204710
机译:背景技术在苏格兰的初级保健中,牙科领域的抗生素处方占抗生素处方总数的9%。苏格兰牙科临床疗效计划​​(SDCEP)于2008年4月(第二版,2011年8月)发布了《牙科药物处方指南》,旨在帮助牙医做出循证抗生素处方决定。然而,处方的广泛差异仍然存在,抗生素的总体使用正在增加。方法RAPiD是一项在整个NHS的NHS General Dental Practices中进行的为期12个月的部分因子集群随机试验。其目的是比较个性化审核和反馈(A&F)策略的有效性,以将SDCEP建议中的抗生素处方转化为实践。该试验在其设计的五个方面使用常规收集的电子医疗数据,以:识别研究人群;申请资格标准;进行分层随机化;产生审判干预;分析试验结果。是否有资格取决于合同状态和最近的NHS治疗规定的最低水平。同时,将苏格兰所有符合条件的牙科实践同时按照基准随机分配到当前的审计实践或干预组中。通过单手/多手操作对随机分组进行分层。在干预实践中工作的普通牙科医生(GDPs)将从基线的前14个月开始接受个性化的图形化处方,在六个月后进行更新。 GDP不能盲目地分配其实践。干预措施使用析因设计进一步随机化,以在有或没有以下情况下接收反馈:基于文本的补充干预;在9个月后提供其他反馈。主要结果是基线干预后一年内每100个疗程的总抗生素处方率。同时进行的定性过程评估将使用基于实施研究的综合框架来应用基于理论的方法,以探索干预措施的可接受性,并通过理论领域框架来确定国内生产总值基于证据的抗生素处方行为的障碍和促成因素。讨论RAPiD将对苏格兰牙科A&F进行有力的评估。它还表明,链接的管理数据集有可能在随机对照试验的所有阶段中得到有效利用。试用注册电流对照试验ISRCTN49204710

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号