首页> 外文期刊>Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia. >Prognostic Value of TIMI Score versus GRACE Score in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
【24h】

Prognostic Value of TIMI Score versus GRACE Score in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

机译:TIMI评分与GRACE评分在ST段抬高型心肌梗死中的预后价值

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: The TIMI Score for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) was created and validated specifically for this clinical scenario, while the GRACE score is generic to any type of acute coronary syndrome. Objective: Between TIMI and GRACE scores, identify the one of better prognostic performance in patients with STEMI. Methods: We included 152 individuals consecutively admitted for STEMI. The TIMI and GRACE scores were tested for their discriminatory ability (C-statistics) and calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow) in relation to hospital death. Results: The TIMI score showed equal distribution of patients in the ranges of low, intermediate and high risk (39 %, 27 % and 34 %, respectively), as opposed to the GRACE Score that showed predominant distribution at low risk (80 %, 13 % and 7%, respectively). Case-fatality was 11%. The C-statistics of the TIMI score was 0.87 (95%CI = 0.76 to 0.98), similar to GRACE (0.87, 95%CI = 0.75 to 0.99) - p = 0.71. The TIMI score showed satisfactory calibration represented by χ2 = 1.4 (p = 0.92), well above the calibration of the GRACE score, which showed χ2 = 14 (p = 0.08). This calibration is reflected in the expected incidence ranges for low, intermediate and high risk, according to the TIMI score (0 %, 4.9 % and 25 %, respectively), differently to GRACE (2.4%, 25% and 73%), which featured middle range incidence inappropriately. Conclusion: Although the scores show similar discriminatory capacity for hospital death, the TIMI score had better calibration than GRACE. These findings need to be validated populations of different risk profiles.
机译:背景:STMI抬高型心肌梗塞(STEMI)的TIMI评分是针对该临床情况专门创建和验证的,而GRACE评分适用于任何类型的急性冠状动脉综合征。目的:在TIMI和GRACE评分之间,确定STEMI患者的更好预后表现之一。方法:我们纳入了152名连续入院STEMI的患者。测试了TIMI和GRACE得分与医院死亡相关的区分能力(C统计)和校准(Hosmer-Lemeshow)。结果:TIMI评分显示患者在低,中和高风险范围内的分布均等(分别为39%,27%和34%),而GRACE评分则显示出低风险占主要比例的患者(80%,分别为13%和7%)。病死率是11%。 TIMI得分的C统计量为0.87(95%CI = 0.76至0.98),与GRACE(0.87,95%CI = 0.75至0.99)-p = 0.71相似。 TIMI评分显示出令人满意的校准,以χ2= 1.4(p = 0.92)表示,远高于GRACE评分的校准,后者显示χ2= 14(p = 0.08)。根据TIMI评分(分别为0%,4.9%和25%),此校准反映在低,中和高风险的预期发病率范围内,与GRACE(2.4%,25%和73%)不同。不恰当地以中等射程为特征。结论:尽管该分数显示出对医院死亡的鉴别能力,但TIMI分数的校正性优于GRACE。这些发现需要经过验证的具有不同风险特征的人群。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号