首页> 外文期刊>Australasian Journal of Information Systems >Painting With and Without Numbers: the use of qualitative and quantitative methods to study social learning
【24h】

Painting With and Without Numbers: the use of qualitative and quantitative methods to study social learning

机译:有数字和无数字绘画:使用定性和定量方法研究社会学习

获取原文
           

摘要

The Enterprise Social Learning Architecture (ESLA) team of the Defence Science and Technology Organisation (DSTO), conducted a four-year research study investigating social learning within the Australian Defence Organisation (ADO). The immediate aim of this research was to understand the issues inherent in building learning, adaptive and sustainable systems. The long-term objective was to develop architectures that would support the development of information systems to guide and enhance organisational learning and facilitate knowledge management. In this paper we will discuss the methodologies used by the ESLA team to gain understanding into effective social learning and the organisational and cultural factors that support such learning. Also, the paper will discuss the lessons learned from methodological approaches to this study as well as support tools used to analyse large volumes of qualitative data. There has been an increasing emphasis in the past decade on investigating the social and organisational factors that may underpin successful information system development and usage (Butterfield and Pendegraft, 1996; Davenport and Prusak, 1992; DeLone and McLean, 1992). Investigation of these issues necessitates a sound understanding of organisational culture, human social interactions, communication and relationships, and reflects an increasing awareness of the importance of the social aspects of socio-technical systems that people work and operate in. This paper describes the process by which the qualitative methods in this study of knowledge processes were expanded to include quantitative methods. It focuses on how this combination of data collection methods evolved, and the ways in which it was capitalised on to provide a much more enriched set of findings than would have been the case if qualitative or quantitative methods had been used alone. The paper also focuses on pitfalls that arose in the use of the various methods, including those associated with the use of software for qualitative data, and the means by which a successful methodological blend can be achieved with research relating to knowledge and its management.
机译:国防科学技术组织(DSTO)的企业社会学习架构(ESLA)团队进行了为期四年的研究,调查了澳大利亚国防组织(ADO)内的社会学习。这项研究的直接目的是了解构建学习,适应性和可持续性系统所固有的问题。长期目标是开发支持信息系统开发的体系结构,以指导和增强组织学习并促进知识管理。在本文中,我们将讨论ESLA团队用来了解有效的社会学习方法以及支持这种学习的组织和文化因素的方法。此外,本文还将讨论从本研究的方法论方法中汲取的教训以及用于分析大量定性数据的支持工具。在过去的十年中,人们越来越重视调查可能支持成功的信息系统开发和使用的社会和组织因素(Butterfield和Pendegraft,1996; Davenport和Prusak,1992; DeLone和McLean,1992)。对这些问题的调查需要对组织文化,人类社会互动,沟通和关系有充分的了解,并反映出人们对人们工作和操作的社会技术系统的社会方面的重要性的认识日益提高。其中,知识过程研究中的定性方法已扩展为包括定量方法。它着眼于这种数据收集方法的组合如何演变,以及如何利用它来提供比单独使用定性或定量方法要丰富得多的发现集。本文还重点介绍了使用各种方法(包括与使用定性数据的软件相关的方法)引起的陷阱,以及通过与知识及其管理有关的研究可以成功实现方法上的融合的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号