首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Intensive Care >Dexmedetomidine in prevention and treatment of postoperative and intensive care unit delirium: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Dexmedetomidine in prevention and treatment of postoperative and intensive care unit delirium: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:右美托咪定在术后重症监护室del妄的预防和治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Abstract BackgroundTo determine the preventive and therapeutic effect of dexmedetomidine on intensive care unit (ICU) delirium.MethodsThe literature search using PubMed and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was performed (August 1, 2018) to detect all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of adult ICU patients receiving dexmedetomidine. Articles were included if they assessed the influence of dexmedetomidine compared to a sedative agent on incidence of ICU delirium or treatment of this syndrome. Accordingly, relevant articles were allocated to the following two groups: (1) articles that assessed the delirium incidence (incidence comparison) or articles that assessed the treatment of delirium (treatment comparison). Incidence of delirium and delirium resolution were the primary outcomes. We combined treatment effects comparing dexmedetomidine versus (1) placebo, (2) standard sedatives, and (3) opioids in random-effects meta-analyses. Risk of bias for each included RCT was assessed following Cochrane standards.ResultsThe literature search resulted in 28 articles (25 articles/4975 patients for the incidence comparison and three articles/166 patients for the treatment comparison). In the incidence comparison, heterogeneity was present in different subgroups. Administration of dexmedetomidine was associated with significantly lower overall incidence of delirium when compared to placebo (RR 0.52; 95% CI 0.39–0.70; I 2?=?37%), standard sedatives (RR 0.63; 95% CI 0.46–0.86; I 2?=?69%), as well as to opioids (RR 0.61; 95% CI 0.44–0.83; I 2?=?0%). Use of dexmedetomidine significantly increased the risks of bradycardia and hypotension. Limited data were available on circulatory insufficiency and mortality. In the treatment comparison, the comparison drugs in the three RCTs were placebo, midazolam, and haloperidol. The resolution of delirium was measured differently in each study. Two out of the three studies indicated clear favorable effects for dexmedetomidine (i.e., compared to placebo and midazolam). The study comparing dexmedetomidine with haloperidol was a pilot study ( n =?20) with high variability in the results.ConclusionFindings suggest that dexmedetomidine reduces incidence and duration of ICU delirium. Furthermore, our systematic searches show that there is limited evidence if a delirium shall be treated with dexmedetomidine.
机译:摘要背景为了确定右美托咪定对重症监护病房(ICU)ir妄的预防和治疗效果,方法(2018年8月1日),使用PubMed和Cochrane对照试验中央注册进行文献检索,以检测右美托咪定的所有随机对照试验(RCT)。成人ICU患者接受右美托咪定。如果他们评估了右美托咪定与镇静剂相比对ICU ir妄发生率或该综合征的治疗的影响,则包括这些文章。因此,相关文章被分配到以下两组:(1)评估the妄发生率的文章(发生率比较)或评估of妄治疗的文章(治疗比较)。 ir妄发生率和resolution妄消退是主要结局。我们在随机效应荟萃分析中比较了右美托咪定与(1)安慰剂,(2)标准镇静剂和(3)阿片类药物的治疗效果。结果根据Cochrane标准评估每个纳入的RCT的偏倚风险。结果文献检索共28篇文章(25篇/ 4975例患者用于发病率比较,三篇/ 166例患者用于治疗比较)。在发生率比较中,不同亚组中存在异质性。与安慰剂(RR 0.52; 95%CI 0.39–0.70; I 2?=?37%),标准镇静剂(RR 0.63; 95%CI 0.46-0.86; I)相比,右美托咪定的给药与with妄的总体发生率显着降低有关2?= 69%),以及阿片类药物(RR 0.61; 95%CI 0.44–0.83; I 2?=?0%)。右美托咪定的使用显着增加了心动过缓和低血压的风险。关于循环功能不全和死亡率的数据有限。在治疗比较中,三个RCT中的比较药物为安慰剂,咪达唑仑和氟哌啶醇。在每项研究中measured妄的分辨率均不同。三分之二的研究表明右美托咪定具有明显的有利作用(即与安慰剂和咪达唑仑相比)。右美托咪定与氟哌啶醇的比较研究是一项前瞻性研究(n = 20),结果差异较大。结论发现右美托咪定可降低ICU ir妄的发生率和持续时间。此外,我们的系统搜索表明,如果if妄应使用右美托咪定治疗,则证据有限。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号