首页> 外文期刊>Critical care : >The confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU) and intensive care delirium screening checklist (ICDSC) for the diagnosis of delirium: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies
【24h】

The confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU) and intensive care delirium screening checklist (ICDSC) for the diagnosis of delirium: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies

机译:重症监护病房(CAM-ICU)和重症监护screening妄检查清单(ICDSC)的of妄评估方法用于del妄的诊断:临床研究的系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
       

摘要

IntroductionDelirium is a frequent form of acute brain dysfunction in critically ill patients, and several detection tools for it have been developed for use in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). The objective of this study is to evaluate the current evidence on the accuracy of the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) and the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) for the diagnosis of delirium in critically ill patients.MethodsA systematic review was conducted to identify articles on the evaluation of the CAM-ICU and the ICDSC in ICU patients. A MEDLINE, SciELO, CINAHL and EMBASE databases search was performed for articles published in the English language, involving adult populations and comparing these diagnostic tools with the gold standard, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) criteria. Results were summarized by meta-analysis. The QUADAS scale was used to assess the quality of the studies.ResultsNine studies evaluating the CAM-ICU (including 969 patients) and four evaluating the ICDSC (n = 361 patients) were included in the final analysis. The pooled sensitivity of the CAM-ICU was 80.0% (95% confidence interval (CI): 77.1 to 82.6%), and the pooled specificity was 95.9% (95% CI: 94.8 to 96.8%). The diagnostic odds ratio was 103.2 (95% CI: 39.6 to 268.8). The pooled area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.97. The pooled sensitivity of the ICDSC was 74% (95% CI: 65.3 to 81.5%), and the pooled specificity was 81.9% (95% CI: 76.7 to 86.4%). The diagnostic odds ratio was 21.5 (95% CI: 8.51 to 54.4). The AUC was 0.89.ConclusionsThe CAM-ICU is an excellent diagnostic tool in critically ill ICU patients, whereas the ICDSC has moderate sensitivity and good specificity. The available data suggest that both CAM-ICU and the ICDSC can be used as a screening tool for the diagnosis of delirium in critically ill patients.
机译:简介ir妄是重症患者急性脑功能障碍的一种常见形式,并且针对重症监护病房(ICU)使用了多种检测工具。这项研究的目的是评估有关重症监护病房(CAM-ICU)和重症监护Deli妄检查清单(ICDSC)的诊断在重症患者patients妄诊断中的准确性的最新证据。进行了综述,以鉴定有关ICU患者中CAM-ICU和ICDSC评估的文章。进行了MEDLINE,SciELO,CINAHL和EMBASE数据库搜索,以英语发布的文章涉及成人人群,并将这些诊断工具与金标准,《精神疾病诊断和统计手册》(DSM-IV)标准进行了比较。通过荟萃分析总结结果。结果使用9个评估CAM-ICU的研究(包括969例患者)和4个评估ICDSC的研究(n = 361例患者)纳入了最终分析。 CAM-ICU的合并敏感性为80.0%(95%置信区间(CI):77.1至82.6%),合并特异性为95.9%(95%CI:94.8至96.8%)。诊断比值比为103.2(95%CI:39.6至268.8)。摘要接收器工作特性曲线(AUC)下的合并区域为0.97。 ICDSC的合并敏感性为74%(95%CI:65.3至81.5%),特异性为81.9%(95%CI:76.7至86.4%)。诊断优势比为21.5(95%CI:8.51至54.4)。 AUC为0.89。结论CAM-ICU是重症ICU患者的出色诊断工具,而ICDSC具有中等敏感性和良好特异性。现有数据表明,CAM-ICU和ICDSC均可作为诊断重症患者del妄的筛查工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号