...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of critical care >Effect of nonpharmacological interventions for the prevention of delirium in the intensive care unit: A systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Effect of nonpharmacological interventions for the prevention of delirium in the intensive care unit: A systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:非武装干预措施对重症监护单位预防谵妄的影响:系统审查与荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

PurposeWe aimed to classify nonpharmacological interventions used for preventing delirium in the intensive care unit (ICU), and estimate their effect size. Materials and methodsIn this systematic review and meta-analysis, the literature was searched and studies were selected based on the PRISMA flow chart. Data sources included MEDLINE, Cochrane, CINHAHL, PsyInfo, and EMBASE. We used Cochrane's Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) criteria in study design and quality assessment of the meta-analysis. ResultsThis systematic review and meta-analysis included 35 and 15 studies, respectively. Studies were grouped into nine intervention types: multicomponent (16 studies), physical environment (9), daily interruption of sedation (2), exercise (2), patient education (2), automatic warning system (1), cerebral hemodynamics improving (1), family participation (1), and sedation reducing protocol (1). The effect size of preventive nonpharmacological interventions had an odds ratio (OR) of 0.66 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50–0.86) for delirium occurrence, and an OR of 0.31 (95% CI, 0.10–0.94) for delirium duration. Although relevant studies by interventions were lacking, a partial subgroup analysis by intervention was performed. ConclusionsNonpharmacological interventions were effective in reducing the duration and occurrence of delirium. Consistent application and development of nonpharmacological interventions for use in the ICU are important.
机译:目的我们旨在分类用于预防重症监护单元(ICU)中的谵妄的非药物干预,并估计其效果大小。材料和方法在该系统审查和荟萃分析中,搜查了文献,并根据PRISMA流程图选择研究。数据来源包括Medline,Cochrane,Cinhahl,Psyinfo和Embase。我们使用Cochrane的有效实践和护理组织(EPOC)在研究设计和质量评估中的荟萃分析。结果STRISSTHIS系统审查和META分析分别包括35和15项研究。研究分为9种干预类型:多组分(16项研究),物理环境(9),镇静(2),运动(2),患者教育(2),自动警告系统(1),脑血流动动力学改善( 1),家庭参与(1),镇静还原协议(1)。预防性非武装干预的效果大小的谵妄发生量(或)的谵妄率为0.66(95%置信区间,0.50-0.86),谵妄持续时间为0.31(95%CI,0.10-0.94) 。虽然缺乏干预措施的相关研究,但通过干预进行部分亚组分析。结论NONONPHMACACACTOM干预措施可有效地减少谵妄的持续时间和发生。在ICU中使用的一致应用和开发非物理干预措施非常重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号