首页> 外文期刊>Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism >Evaluation of creatinine-based and cystatin C-based equations for estimation of glomerular filtration rate in type 1 diabetic patients
【24h】

Evaluation of creatinine-based and cystatin C-based equations for estimation of glomerular filtration rate in type 1 diabetic patients

机译:评估基于肌酸酐和胱抑素C的方程式以评估1型糖尿病患者的肾小球滤过率

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective Several formulas based in different biomarkers may be used to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GRF). However, all of them have some limitations, and it is very important to evaluate their performances in different groups of patients. Therefore, we compared GFR, as estimated by creatinine-based and cystatin C-based equations, according to albuminuria, in type 1 diabetes (T1DM), in an observational case-control study. Subjects and methods T1DM patients were classified according to albuminuria: normoalbuminuric (n = 63), microalbuminuric (n = 30), macroalbuminuric (n = 32). GFR was calculated using creatinine-based and cystatin C-based (aMDRD, CKD-EPIcr, CKD-EPIcys, MacIsaac, Tan and CKD-EPIcrcys) equations. Spearman Correlation was used to evaluate the correlation of GFR estimated by the formulas with albuminuria. ROC curves were constructed to compare AUCs of GFR estimated by equations, in reference to macroalbuminuria. Sensibility, specificity and accuracy were calculated for a cut-off < 60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . Results GFR estimated by creatinine-based and cystatin C-based equations significantly differed among normoalbuminuric, microalbuminuric and macroalbuminuric patients. Spearman correlation and AUCs of GFR estimated by creatinine-based and cystatin C-based formulas were very similar to each other, though cystatin C-based equations presented better correlation with albuminuria and higher AUCs than the creatinine-based ones, and the best accuracy to detect macroalbuminuric patients. Conclusion Although GFR estimated by all creatinine-based and cystatin C-based equations permitted the differentiation between T1DM patients, according to albuminuria, cystatin C-based equations presented best accuracy to detect macroalbuminuria in T1DM patients and should be considered in the clinical routine in order to increase the possibility of early diagnostic of chronic renal disease.
机译:目的可以使用几种基于不同生物标记物的公式来估计肾小球滤过率(GRF)。但是,它们都有一定的局限性,评估它们在不同患者组中的表现非常重要。因此,在一项观察性病例对照研究中,我们根据蛋白尿比较了通过基于肌酐和基于胱抑素C的方程式估算的GFR,方法是根据1型糖尿病(T1DM)。受试者和方法T1DM患者根据蛋白尿分类:正常白蛋白尿(n = 63),微量白蛋白尿(n = 30),大蛋白尿(n = 32)。使用基于肌酸酐和半胱氨酸蛋白酶抑制剂C(aMDRD,CKD-EPIcr,CKD-EPIcys,MacIsaac,Tan和CKD-EPIcrcys)公式计算GFR。用Spearman Correlation评估公式估算的GFR与蛋白尿的相关性。参照大白蛋白尿,构建ROC曲线以比较方程式估算的GFR的AUC。计算的截断值<60 mL / min / 1.73 m 2的敏感性,特异性和准确性。结果在正常白蛋白尿,微白蛋白尿和大白蛋白尿患者中,通过基于肌酐和基于胱抑素C的方程式估算的GFR显着不同。通过基于肌酸酐和基于胱抑素C的公式估算的GFR的Spearman相关性和AUC彼此非常相似,尽管基于胱抑素C的方程式与白蛋白尿的相关性更好,并且与基于肌酐的方程式相比具有更高的AUC,并且具有最高的准确性检测大型白蛋白尿患者。结论尽管通过所有基于肌酐和基于胱抑素C的方程式估算的GFR可以区分T1DM患者,但根据蛋白尿,基于胱抑素C的方程式在T1DM患者中检测白蛋白尿的准确性最高,应在临床常规中按顺序考虑以增加早期诊断慢性肾脏病的可能性。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号