首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Biological Research >Educational Philosophy Preferences in Physical Education Students
【24h】

Educational Philosophy Preferences in Physical Education Students

机译:体育专业学生的教育哲学偏好

获取原文
           

摘要

The purpose of this study was investigation of educational philosophy preference of physical education (P.E) students. Total 266 male and female P.E students of Islamic Azad University of East-Tehran, Ayatollah Amoli, Babol and Arak were evaluated by “philosophy preference assessment” questionnaire (designed by Wise and Bandy, 2002). This questionnaire included 40 questions in 5 philosophy subunits “idealism, perennialism, realism, experimentalism, existentialism.” Ayatollah Amoli male students use all of philosophies in one range, but the female students, significantly use idealism as a dominant educational philosophy East-Tehran and Babol male and female students philosophy preference was significantly idealism and philosophy. Arak male students selected significantly realism as their dominant philosophy. Although the dominant philosophy of the majority of the male and females was idealism, our result showed the impressiveness of sex factor on selection power. Also the existence of difference among different universities indicated a disagreement among the teachers of this lesson (subject).
机译:这项研究的目的是调查体育教育学生的教育哲学偏好。东德黑兰伊斯兰阿扎德大学,Ayatollah Amoli,Babol和Arak的266名男女体育学生接受了“哲学偏好评估”问卷的评估(由Wise和Bandy设计,2002年)。该问卷包括5个哲学子单元中的40个问题:“理想主义,常年主义,现实主义,实验主义,存在主义”。阿亚图拉·阿莫利(Ayatollah Amoli)男生在一个范围内使用所有哲学,但女学生大量使用唯心主义作为主导的教育哲学,东德黑兰和巴博(Babol)男女学生的哲学偏好则明显是唯心主义和哲学。 Arak男学生选择了显着的现实主义作为他们的主导哲学。尽管大多数男性和女性的主要哲学是理想主义,但我们的结果表明性别因素对选择力的影响令人印象深刻。同样,不同大学之间存在差异也表明本课程的教师之间存在分歧(主题)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号