首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Medicine and Surgery >Stapled versus hand-sewn cervical esophagogastric anastomosis in patients undergoing esophagectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study
【24h】

Stapled versus hand-sewn cervical esophagogastric anastomosis in patients undergoing esophagectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study

机译:食管切除术患者的吻合式吻合术与手工缝制式宫颈食管胃吻合术:一项回顾性队列研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Introduction Anastomotic leak is one of the main causes of morbidity following esophageal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. We compared hand sewn and stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomotic techniques in terms of postoperative complications. Methods All patients who underwent esophagectomy with cervical esophagogastric anastomosis at a single academic center from 2004 to 2014 were included in the study. Both early and late complications were analyzed. Results 153 patients underwent resection for carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. Of these 140 patients had esophagectomy with cervical esophagogastric anastomosis. 66 patients underwent a hand sewn anastomosis and 74 patients had a side-to-side stapled anastomosis fashioned. Both groups were comparable with respect to preoperative characteristics. There was no difference in the operative blood loss and T and N stage of the disease. The overall morbidity and mortality was 32.8% and 6.4%, respectively. Overall leak rate was 17%. There was no difference in the leak rates among two groups (12 in the hand-sewn group & 12 in the Stapled stapled group; p?=?0.82). The rate of anastomotic stricture was significantly higher for the hand sewn group (16.1% vs 4.3%; p?=?0.03) at median follow up of 30 months. Conclusion Both hand sewn and stapled anastomotic techniques are equally effective way of performing a cervical esophagogastric anastomosis. However, patients having anastomotic leak develop anastomotic stricture more often in those having hand-sewn anastomosis compared to stapled anastomosis. Highlights ? We analyzed & compared the outcomes of cervical esophagogastric anastomosis between hand sewn and partial side to side stapled technique. ? Both hand sewn and stapled techniques are equally effective way of performing a cervical esophagogastric anastomosis. ? Anastomotic leak results in anastomotic stricture more often with hand-sewn anastomosis than stapled.
机译:引言吻合口漏是食管癌和胃食管交界处食管癌切除术后发病的主要原因之一。我们比较了手工缝制和吻合式颈食管胃吻合术的术后并发症。方法将2004年至2014年在同一学术中心接受食管切除术并经颈食管胃吻合术的所有患者纳入研究。分析了早期和晚期并发症。结果153例患者因食管和胃食管交界处癌切除。在这140例患者中,食管切除术伴有颈段食管胃吻合术。 66例患者进行了手工缝制吻合术,74例患者进行了侧向吻合吻合术。两组在术前特征方面具有可比性。该病的术中失血量和T,N分期无差异。总体发病率和死亡率分别为32.8%和6.4%。总体泄漏率为17%。两组之间的泄漏率没有差异(手工缝制组为12,订书钉装订组为12; p = 0.82)。在中位随访30个月时,手工缝制组的吻合口狭窄发生率明显更高(16.1%vs 4.3%;p≤0.03)。结论手工缝合和吻合钉吻合术都是进行食管胃吻合术的有效方法。然而,与吻合钉吻合术相比,手缝吻合术中吻合口漏的患者更容易发生吻合口狭窄。强调 ?我们分析并比较了手工缝制和部分侧对侧缝合技术之间的食管胃吻合术的结果。 ?手工缝制和装订技术都是进行食管胃吻合术的同等有效方式。 ?吻合口吻合术比缝合吻合术更常导致吻合口狭窄。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号