首页> 外文期刊>BMC Gastroenterology >Comparison of end-to-side hand-sewn and side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis in patients with lower thoracic esophageal cancer undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy: an Iranian retrospective cohort study
【24h】

Comparison of end-to-side hand-sewn and side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis in patients with lower thoracic esophageal cancer undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy: an Iranian retrospective cohort study

机译:近胸部食管癌患者骨头切除术患者末端手工缝制和侧面吻合宫颈食管吻合术的比较:伊朗回顾队列研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Controversies in terms of efficacy and postoperative advantages surround stapled esophagogastric anastomosis compared with the hand-sewn technique as a treatment for patients with esophageal cancer. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of hand-sewn end-to-side esophago-gastrostomy and side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy for the aforementioned patients. This retrospective cohort study involved examining the medical records of 433 patients who underwent transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer from March 2010 to March 2016. All the patients were operated using end-to-side hand-sewn esophago-gastrostomy and side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis. 409 of the patients received a year’s worth of follow-up evaluations. All the cases were revisited in 2?weeks as well as in four, eight, and 12?months after surgery. The patients were assessed in terms of postoperative outcomes, including reflux symptoms, anastomotic leakage and stricture, and the need for anastomotic dilatation. Hand-sewn anastomosis was carried out in 271 (62.5%) patients, whereas stapled anastomosis was performed in 162 (37.4%) patients. The mean operative times were 214.46?±?84.33?min and 250.55?±?43.31?min for the stapled and hand-sewn anastomosis groups, respectively (P?=?0.028). The two groups showed no significant differences with respect to stays in intensive care units and hospitals. Postoperatively, 38 (14.67%) cases of anastomotic leakage were detected in the hand-sewn anastomosis group, with incidence being significantly higher than that in the stapled anastomosis group (8 cases or 5.33%; P?=?0.002). Anastomotic stricture occurred less frequently in the patients who underwent stapled anastomosis (P?=?0.004). Within the one-year follow-up period, the patients treated via hand-sewn anastomosis more frequently required anastomotic dilatation (P?=?0.02). Side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis may reduce operation times and decrease the rates of anastomotic leakage, anastomotic stricture, and anastomotic dilatation in patients with lower thoracic esophageal cancer undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy.
机译:疗效和术后优势的争论与食管癌患者的治疗相比,染色食管胃癌吻合术而言环绕着食管瘤吻合。本研究的目的是在食管切除术治疗前述患者的食管切除术后比较手缝的端到侧食道 - 胃痛术和侧面吻合宫颈食管瘤的临床结果。这项回顾性队列研究涉及从2010年3月到2010年3月期间检查433名患者的医疗记录,该患者接受了食管癌食管癌食管癌的患者。所有患者都是使用端到侧的手工缝制食道胃术和侧面钉操作宫颈食管胃癌吻合术。 409名患者接受了一年的后续评估。所有病例均在2个?周以及四个,八个和12个月后重新审视,手术后几个月。患者在术后结果评估,包括回流症状,吻合泄漏和狭窄,以及对吻合口的需求。在271例(62.5%)患者中进行手工贴膜吻合术,而甜食吻合术在162例(37.4%)患者中进行。平均手术时间为214.46?±84.33?min和250.55?±43.31?分别用于犯规和手工缝制吻合组(p?= 0.028)。这两组与重症监护病房和医院保持显着差异。术后,38例(14.67%)在手缝束吻合组中检测到吻合口泄漏的病例,发病率明显高于甜食吻合组(8例或5.33%; P?= 0.002)。吻合体狭窄在接受吻合吻合术(P?= 0.004)的患者中较少发生。在一年的随访期内,通过手工缝制吻合术治疗的患者更常见所需的吻合症状扩张(P?= 0.02)。侧面套管宫颈食管胃癌吻合术可以减少操作程度,降低患有胸腔食管癌患者的吻合口渗漏,吻合狭窄和吻合症状扩张的速度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号