首页> 外文期刊>Animals >An Evaluation of Two Different Broiler Catching Methods
【24h】

An Evaluation of Two Different Broiler Catching Methods

机译:两种不同肉鸡捕获方法的评估

获取原文
           

摘要

Catching is the first step in the pre-slaughter chain for broiler chickens. The process may be detrimental for animal welfare due to the associated handling. The aim of this pilot study was to compare two different methods to manually catch broilers: Catching the broilers by two legs and carrying them inverted (LEGS) or catching the broilers under the abdomen and carrying them in an upright position (UPRIGHT). Wing and leg fractures upon arrival at the abattoir, animal density in the drawers, birds on their back, broilers dead-on-arrival and time to fill the transport modules were investigated. The results showed that mean crating time was shorter in the UPRIGHT method ( p = 0.007). There was a tendency for more wing fractures in broilers caught by the LEGS ( p = 0.06). The animal density in the drawers was lower and with a smaller range in the UPRIGHT method ( p = 0.022). The results indicate that catching the broilers under the abdomen in an upright position may improve broiler welfare in terms of fewer wing fractures, more consistent stocking density in drawers and potentially reduced loading time.
机译:捕捉是肉鸡预屠宰链中的第一步。由于相关的处理,该过程可能对动物福利有害。这项初步研究的目的是比较两种手动捕获肉鸡的方法:用两只脚抓住肉鸡并倒置(LEGS),或将肉鸡放在腹部下并以直立的姿势(UPRIGHT)。调查了到达屠宰场的机翼和腿部骨折,抽屉中的动物密度,背部的禽鸟,到来的肉鸡死亡以及填充运输模块的时间。结果表明,使用UPRIGHT方法可缩短平均装箱时间(p = 0.007)。用LEGS捕获的肉鸡有更多的机翼骨折倾向(p = 0.06)。在UPRIGHT方法中,抽屉中的动物密度较低,范围较小(p = 0.022)。结果表明,以直立的姿势将肉鸡挂在腹部下方可能会改善肉鸡的福利,因为它们的侧翼骨折更少,抽屉中的放养密度更一致,并且有可能减少装载时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号