...
首页> 外文期刊>American journal of public health >Health in Working-Aged Americans: Adults With High School Equivalency Diploma Are Similar to Dropouts, Not High School Graduates
【24h】

Health in Working-Aged Americans: Adults With High School Equivalency Diploma Are Similar to Dropouts, Not High School Graduates

机译:劳动年龄美国人的健康:高中同等文凭的成年人与辍学率相似,而非高中毕业生

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objectives. We compared health outcomes for adults with the General Equivalency Diploma (GED) and regular high school diploma to determine whether GED recipients are equivalent to regular graduates despite research that documents their disadvantages in other outcomes. Methods. We used 1997 to 2009 National Health Interview Survey cross-sectional data on high school dropouts, graduates, and GED recipients aged 30 to 65 years (n?=?76?705). Five general health indicators and 20 health conditions were analyzed using logistic models. Results. GED recipients had a significantly higher prevalence of every health outcome compared with high school graduates (odds ratios?=?1.3–2.7). The GED–high school differences attenuated but remained evident after controlling for health insurance, economic status, and health behaviors. For most conditions, the 95% confidence interval for GED earners overlapped with that for high school dropouts. Conclusions. The high school equivalency diploma was associated with nonequivalent health: adults with a GED had health comparable to that of high school dropouts, not graduates. GED recipients were at increased risk for many health conditions, and their health should be viewed as distinct from regular graduates. The findings have implications for health and educational policies. The General Equivalency Diploma (GED) has been available since 1942 as a credential certifying the completion of secondary education, an alternative to a regular high school graduation. The annual number of recipients has been increasing steadily to about half a million in recent years, representing between 10% and 25% of all high school credentials. 1–3 A typical test taker is about 25 years old. Approximately 40% of the diplomas are awarded to women, 60% to Whites, and about 18% each to Black and Hispanic adults. 4 Over the course of the past 70 years, 18 million adults have earned the GED. 4 The GED's value is predicated on the assumption that the degree is comparable to the regular high school diploma. Most population and education statistics, for instance, count GED recipients together with regular graduates. 5,6 In some ways, this equivalence assumption is true. The knowledge and cognitive skills required of successful GED test takers are comparable to those of regular graduates. 1 College admission procedures almost uniformly accept the GED as a marker of the completion of secondary education. 7 In numerous important ways, however, research showed that the outcomes of the GED recipients are not equivalent to those of regular high school graduates. Two benchmark studies published in the 1990s established that adults with a GED had consistently and considerably worse labor market outcomes than regular graduates. 8,9 More than a dozen studies since then have corroborated this difference. 10–12 Additionally, researchers also documented the GED disadvantage in outcomes such as lower college completion rates, 1 higher attrition from the military, 9 higher crime rates, 13 and higher rates of substance use. 13 Little if anything is known about the health of adults with a GED, despite the fact that the links between education in general and health were studied extensively. 14–16 One reason why health outcomes among GED recipients had been neglected is that until recently, few representative health surveys distinguished between a GED and a regular high school diploma. Recently, some researchers began examining health-related outcomes. GED recipients were found to have higher rates of smoking and alcohol use compared with graduates, 17,18 and possibly also higher rates of depression. 13,19 A recent study of mortality found that GED earners had higher risks of dying than regular graduates, 20 although only among younger cohorts. We compared GED and regular high school recipients using 25 health outcomes in a large, nationally representative sample of US working-aged adults. In addition to the GED–high school comparison, we also included high school dropouts in our analyses. GED recipients were assumed to be equivalent to high school graduates in knowledge and ability. In 2 key aspects, however, adults with GEDs were more comparable to high school dropouts: both groups attended school for about 10 years, on average, 9 and both groups made the decision to drop out of high school before completion. The inclusion of dropouts allowed us to better describe where the GEDs fall: are they equivalent to high school graduates as they theoretically can be expected to be on the basis of their credentials, or are they similar to the dropouts, to whom they can be compared on the basis of years of schooling and the decision to discontinue secondary schooling?.
机译:目标。我们将成年人的健康结局与普通同等学历文凭(GED)和常规高中文凭进行了比较,以确定GED接受者是否等同于常规毕业生,尽管有研究表明他们在其他结局方面的劣势。方法。我们使用了1997年至2009年的《全国健康访问调查》横断面数据,这些数据涉及30至65岁的高中辍学生,毕业生和GED接受者(n?=?76?705)。使用逻辑模型分析了五个一般健康指标和20个健康状况。结果。与高中毕业生相比,接受GED者的每项健康结局患病率均显着更高(优势比== 1.3-2.7)。在控制健康保险,经济状况和健康行为之后,GED与高中的差异有所减弱,但仍然很明显。在大多数情况下,GED收入者的95%置信区间与高中辍学者的置信区间重叠。结论。高中同等学历文凭与非同等健康状况相关:患有GED的成年人的健康状况与高中辍学者相当,而不是毕业生。 GED接受者面临许多健康状况的风险增加,应将其健康与普通毕业生区分开来。研究结果对健康和教育政策有影响。普通等效文凭(GED)自1942年以来就已可用,可作为完成中学教育的凭证,是普通高中毕业的一种替代。近年来,每年的接收者人数稳定增长至约100万,占所有高中证书的10%至25%。 1-3个典型的应试者大约25岁。大约40%的文凭颁发给女性,60%授予白人,黑人和西班牙裔成年人各获得18%。 4在过去的70年中,有1800万成年人获得了GED。 4 GED的价值是基于该学位与普通高中文凭相当的假设。例如,大多数人口和教育统计都将GED接收者与正规毕业生一起计算在内。 5,6在某些方面,这种等效假设是正确的。成功参加GED考试的人所需的知识和认知技能与普通毕业生相当。 1大学入学程序几乎都接受GED作为完成中学教育的标志。 7然而,研究显示,在许多重要的方面,接受GED的人的成绩与普通高中毕业生的不一样。在1990年代发表的两项基准研究确定,患有GED的成年人在劳动力市场上的表现始终比普通毕业生差得多。 [8,9]自那时以来,十几项研究证实了这种差异。 10–12此外,研究人员还记录了GED在结局方面的劣势,例如较低的大学结业率,1较高的军人损耗,9较高的犯罪率,13和较高的吸毒率。 13尽管对普通教育与健康之间的联系进行了广泛研究,但对患有GED的成年人的健康知之甚少。 14–16接受GED接受者的健康结果被忽略的原因之一是,直到最近,很少有代表性的健康调查区分GED和常规的高中文凭。最近,一些研究人员开始检查与健康相关的结果。发现GED接受者的吸烟和饮酒率比毕业生高[17,18],抑郁症的患病率也可能更高。 13,19最近的一项死亡率研究发现,GED收入者的死亡风险比普通毕业生要高,[20]尽管只在年轻的人群中。我们在一个具有全国代表性的美国劳动年龄成年人的大型样本中,使用25种健康结果比较了GED和普通高中接受者。除了GED与高中的比较之外,我们的分析还包括高中辍学的情况。假设GED接受者在知识和能力上与高中毕业生相当。但是,在两个关键方面,患有GED的成年人与高中辍学的可比性更高:两组平均上学时间约为10年,并且两组都决定在完成学业之前辍学。辍学的纳入使我们能够更好地描述GED的下落:理论上可以预期他们是基于高中毕业证书,还是相当于高中毕业生,还是类似于辍学,可以与之比较?根据受教育年限和决定终止中学教育?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号