首页> 外文期刊>Advances in Alzheimer's Disease >Cognitive and Functional Profiles in Mild-to-Moderate Alzheimer’s Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment Compared to Healthy Elderly
【24h】

Cognitive and Functional Profiles in Mild-to-Moderate Alzheimer’s Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment Compared to Healthy Elderly

机译:与健康老年人相比,轻度至中度阿尔茨海默氏病和轻度认知障碍的认知和功能特征

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) and mild-to-moderate Alzheimer’s disease (AD) are clinically distinct but impact cognitive and functional ability similarly. Comprehensive assessment of cognitive and functional deficits may prove useful in informing differential diagnosis in early stages of dementia and in informing endpoint selection in therapeutic AD trials. Objective: The objective of this study was to characterize patterns of cognitive and functional impairment in aMCI and mild-to-moderate AD subjects compared to cognitively intact healthy elderly (HE). Methods: Thirty-one healthy elderly, 20 aMCI and 19 AD participants were administered a cognitive test battery that included the ADAS-Cog and functional assessments. Z-scores were calculated for all endpoints based on the HE reference group. Results: Cognitive deficits were observed in AD and aMCI participants relative to the referent group. On average, aMCI participants performed 1 - 2 standard deviations below HE on cognitive tests, and AD participants performed 2 - 3 standard deviations below HE. Domain-specific functional deficits among AD participants (z- score -0.4 to -6.4) were consistently greater than those of aMCI participants (z-score 0 to -1.7). Conclusion: This study provides further support for comprehensive assessment and monitoring of cognitive and functional domain scores in the diagnosis and treatment of aMCI and mild AD. Domain-specific cognitive scores may be more useful than composite scores in characterizing impairment and decline. Measuring domains such as attention, processing speed and executive function may increase the sensitivity of detecting disease progression and therapeutic effects, particularly in mild-moderate AD where memory decline may be too slow to detect drug effects during a typical clinical trial.
机译:背景:遗忘性轻度认知障碍(aMCI)和轻度至中度的阿尔茨海默氏病(AD)在临床上是不同的,但对认知和功能能力的影响相似。认知和功能缺陷的综合评估可能有助于在痴呆早期阶段进行鉴别诊断,并在治疗性AD试验中为终点选择提供依据。目的:本研究的目的是鉴定与认知完好的健康老年人(HE)相比,aMCI和轻度至中度AD受试者的认知和功能障碍的模式。方法:对31名健康老年人,20名aMCI和19名AD参与者进行了认知测试,包括ADAS-Cog和功能评估。基于HE参考组,计算了所有端点的Z评分。结果:相对于参照组,AD和aMCI参与者观察到认知缺陷。平均而言,aMCI参与者在认知测试中表现出低于HE的1-2个标准差,而AD参与者表现出低于HE的2-3个标准差。 AD参与者之间的特定领域功能缺陷(z评分-0.4至-6.4)始终大于aMCI参与者(z评分0至-1.7)。结论:本研究为aMCI和轻度AD的诊断和治疗中认知和功能领域评分的综合评估和监测提供了进一步的支持。领域特定的认知评分可能比综合评分更能表征损伤和衰退。测量注意力,处理速度和执行功能等领域可能会提高检测疾病进展和治疗效果的敏感性,特别是在轻度中度AD中,在典型的临床试验中,记忆力下降可能太慢而无法检测药物作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号