首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society: JINS >Different cognitive profiles between mild cognitive impairment due to cerebral small vessel disease and mild cognitive impairment of Alzheimer's disease origin.
【24h】

Different cognitive profiles between mild cognitive impairment due to cerebral small vessel disease and mild cognitive impairment of Alzheimer's disease origin.

机译:脑小血管疾病引起的轻度认知障碍与阿尔茨海默氏病起源的轻度认知障碍之间的不同认知特征。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Controversy surrounds the differences of the cognitive profile between mild cognitive impairment resulting from cerebral small vessel disease (MCI-SVD) and mild cognitive impairment associated with prodromal Alzheimer's disease (MCI-AD). The aim of this study was to explore and compare the cognitive features of MCI-SVD and MCI-AD. MCI-SVD patients (n = 56), MCI-AD patients (n = 30), and normal control subjects (n = 80) were comprehensively evaluated with neuropsychological tests covering five cognitive domains. The performance was compared between groups. Tests that discriminated between MCI-SVD and MCI-AD were identified. Multiple cognitive domains were impaired in MCI-SVD group, while memory and executive function were mainly impaired in MCI-AD group. Compared with MCI-SVD, MCI-AD patients performed relatively worse on memory tasks, but better on processing speed measures. The AVLT Long Delay Free Recall, Digit Symbol Test, and Stroop Test Part A (performance time) in combination categorized 91.1% of MCI-SVD patients and 86.7% of MCI-AD patients correctly. Current study suggested a nonspecific neuropsychological profile for MCI-SVD and a more specific cognitive pattern in MCI-AD. MCI-AD patients demonstrated greater memory impairment with relatively preserved mental processing speed compared with MCI-SVD patients. Tests tapping these two domains might be potentially useful for differentiating MCI-SVD and MCI-AD patients.
机译:争议围绕由脑小血管疾病引起的轻度认知障碍(MCI-SVD)和与前驱性阿尔茨海默氏病相关的轻度认知障碍(MCI-AD)之间的认知差异。这项研究的目的是探索和比较MCI-SVD和MCI-AD的认知特​​征。 MCI-SVD患者(n = 56),MCI-AD患者(n = 30)和正常对照组(n = 80)通过涵盖五个认知领域的神经心理学测试进行了综合评估。比较各组之间的表现。确定了区分MCI-SVD和MCI-AD的测试。 MCI-SVD组的多个认知域受损,而MCI-AD组的记忆和执行功能主要受损。与MCI-SVD相比,MCI-AD患者在记忆任务上的表现相对较差,但在处理速度方面表现较好。 AVLT长时延免费召回,数字符号测试和Stroop测试A部分(执行时间)的组合对91.1%的MCI-SVD患者和86.7%的MCI-AD患者进行了正确分类。当前的研究表明,MCI-SVD具有非特异性的神经心理学特征,而MCI-AD则具有更为特异性的认知模式。与MCI-SVD患者相比,MCI-AD患者表现出更大的记忆障碍和相对保留的心理处理速度。挖掘这两个域的测试对于区分MCI-SVD和MCI-AD患者可能潜在有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号