...
首页> 外文期刊>African Journal of Biotechnology >Comparison of ompP5 sequence-based typing and pulsed-filed gel electrophoresis for genotyping of Haemophilus parasuis
【24h】

Comparison of ompP5 sequence-based typing and pulsed-filed gel electrophoresis for genotyping of Haemophilus parasuis

机译:基于ompP5序列的分型和脉冲场凝胶电泳对副猪嗜血杆菌基因分型的比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In this study, comparison of the outer membrane protein P5 gene (ompP5) sequence-based typing?with?pulsed-field gel electrophoresis?(PFGE) for the genotyping of?Haemophilus parasuis, the?15?serovar?reference strains and 43 isolates?were investigated. When comparing the two methods,?31?ompP5?sequence types?(STs)?and 43 PFGE types?were identified?withompP5?STs?A16 and A28?being the?dominant?ompP5?ST types, while?no predominant PFGE type was found.?The discriminatory indices?were?0.95?for?ompP5?sequence-based method and 0.98 for PFGE, and?the two techniques were proved to be?70.7% congruent. Therefore,ompP5?sequence-based typing?was a simple?and inexpensive method, enabling it as a preliminary technique to research the molecular differentiation of?H. parasuis.
机译:在这项研究中,比较基于外膜蛋白P5基因(ompP5)的分型与“脉冲场凝胶电泳”(PFGE)对副猪嗜血杆菌,“ 15”血清型参考菌株和43种分离株的基因分型。被调查。比较这两种方法时,确定了31种ompP5序列类型(STs)和43种PFGE类型,其中ompP5 STs的A16和A28是主要的ompP5 ST类型,而没有PFGE的主要类型发现基于ompP5序列方法的判别指标为0.95,对于PFGE为0.98,这两种技术的判别率均达到70.7%。因此,基于序列的ompP5分型是一种简单且廉价的方法,使其成为研究?H分子分化的初步技术。副猪

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号