首页> 外文期刊>Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica >Operative vs. nonoperative treatment for comminuted proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a current meta-analysis
【24h】

Operative vs. nonoperative treatment for comminuted proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a current meta-analysis

机译:老年患者肱骨近端粉碎性骨折的手术治疗与非手术治疗:最新的荟萃分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of operative vs. nonoperative treatment for comminuted proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients regarding clinical results, complications, and additional surgeries. Methods: Six electronic databases (Medline, Embase, Clinical, Ovid, Biosos, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were systematically searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Eligible RCTs published between 1960–2012 comparing operative vs. nonoperative treatment of comminuted proximal humeral fractures were included. Trial quality was assessed using the modified Jadad scale. Data from included studies were pooled with the use of fixed-effects and random-effects models with mean difference and risk ratios for continuous and dichotomous variables, respectively. Sensitivity analysis was performed to account for bias in patient selection. Results: Six studies matched the selection criteria, reporting on 287 patients. One hundred fourty-four patients (50.17%) were managed nonoperatively, 20 patients (6.97%) underwent tension band fixation, 55 patients (19.16%) were treated with locked plate, and 68 patients (23.69%) underwent hemiarthroplasty. Mean follow-up ranged from 12–50 months. Results showed no significant difference in post-treatment Constant scores and DASH scores, but conservative treatment showed superior results compared to operative treatment using EQ-5D?. Compared with operative treatment, nonoperative treatment led to significantly fewer complications and additional surgeries. Findings from subgroup analyses remained consistent with these outcomes when compared to nonoperative treatment with tension band fixation, locked plate fixation, and hemiarthroplasty. Conclusion: Compared with operative treatment for closed comminuted proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients, conservative treatment can effectively reduce the risk of additional surgeries and complications. However, there is no statistical difference between operative and nonoperative treatment in terms of clinical outcomes. DOI: 10.3944/AOTT.2015.14.0451
机译:目的:本研究的目的是比较老年患者肱骨近端粉碎性骨折的手术治疗与非手术治疗在临床结果,并发症和其他手术方面的效果。方法:系统检索了六个电子数据库(Medline,Embase,Clinical,Ovid,Biosos和Cochrane中央对照试验注册中心),以鉴定随机对照试验(RCT)。纳入了1960-2012年间发表的符合条件的RCT,比较了粉碎性肱骨近端骨折的手术治疗与非手术治疗。使用改良的Jadad量表评估审判质量。使用固定效应和随机效应模型合并纳入研究的数据,固定模型和随机效应模型分别具有连续变量和二分变量的均值差和风险比。进行敏感性分析以解决患者选择方面的偏见。结果:六项研究符合选择标准,报告了287例患者。手术治疗144例(50.17%),张力带固定治疗20例(6.97%),锁定钢板治疗55例(19.16%),半髋成形术68例(23.69%)。平均随访时间为12至50个月。结果显示,治疗后的Constant评分和DASH评分均无显着性差异,但保守治疗与使用EQ-5D?进行的手术治疗相比,结果更好。与手术治疗相比,非手术治疗显着减少了并发症并增加了手术。与张力带固定,锁定钢板固定和半髋置换的非手术治疗相比,亚组分析的结果仍与这些结果一致。结论:与老年闭合性粉碎性肱骨近端粉碎性骨折的手术治疗相比,保守治疗可有效降低再次手术和并发症的风险。但是,就临床结果而言,手术和非手术治疗之间没有统计学差异。 DOI:10.3944 / AOTT.2015.14.0451

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号