首页> 外文期刊>A+BE : Architecture and the Built Environment >Urban Vitality in Dutch and Chinese New Towns. A comparative study between Almere and Tongzhou
【24h】

Urban Vitality in Dutch and Chinese New Towns. A comparative study between Almere and Tongzhou

机译:荷兰和中国新市镇的城市活力。阿尔梅勒与通州的比较研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Building new towns seems to be a rational regionalization approach that releases pressure from overly burdened large cities. This strategy was developed in Western Europe in the middle of twentieth century. Since the 1990s, the European new town model has been widely implemented in China. However, the author questions the feasibility of the large-scale, hasty new town developments. The study of worldwide new town experiences, especially European and Chinese cases, demonstrates that many new towns in fact have difficulty in achieving a real sense of urban quality and vitality. So far, few research projects have been conducted to evaluate and develop solutions for this problem. The purpose of this research project is therefore to identify the spatial and non-spatial factors and conditions that facilitate the development of urban vitality in new towns. It is aimed to reveal the impacts of spatial design, urban planning and governance approaches on the degree and patterns of local urban life of new towns in China and in the Netherlands. The generated knowledge of this research project helps develop not only a better understanding of the main problems of new towns, but also spatial strategies with the aim to enliven new towns and other types of (sub)urban areas as well. The central research question is approached through literature review and case studies. The literature review provides a critical re-evaluation of the scientific validation of the new town model, especially the notion of town self-containment in economic terms. The relevant theories under study mainly include regional science and economic geography. The literature review also clarifies the general definition of urban vitality and its distinct meanings in different socio-economic and political backgrounds of the two societies, sets up the quantitative measurements methodology, and identifies a preliminary framework of spatial factors and conditions. As it turns out, the key indicators of urban vitality are the co-presence of people as well as the social, cultural and economic activities in public spaces. The primary conditions are categorized as attractor-determinism, space-determinism and people-determinism. In regard to the spatial factors, the focus is on the spatial configuration of street networks, the composition of urban blocks and neighborhoods, as well as the value of details on small scales. The non-spatial factors primarily include the changing urban planning and governance approaches. The systems approach of planning and control, and the decentralization of decision-making powers are of particular importance to the topic. Various urban vitality evaluation criteria are derived, and then applied and tested in the comparative case studies. The Dutch new town Almere and the Chinese new town Tongzhou are both important new towns in their regions. They are selected based on their contrasting features as planned and market-driven, self-organized new towns, and the resultant differences in the level and character of their urban vitality. It is believed that their governments could gain inspiration from each other’s experiences for the future development of the towns. The key analytical approach of the case studies is to overlap multiple layers of top-down socio-spatial analyses with the actual space use from the bottom-up field investigations. The spatial analysis focuses on finding relations between the distribution of the planned and unplanned socioeconomic activities and the spatial configuration of different elements on different scales. Space syntax is adopted as one of the key analytical tools. The field study tasks include registering people’s movement of flows through static snapshots method, the mapping of self-organized small-businesses, activities and space appropriations, and conducting interviews and surveys of city officials, local people and shop owners. The results of the comparative case studies show that there is a strong correlation between space and the socio-economic life in new towns. As a market-driven, spontaneous new town, streets are the key places for socio-economic activities in Tongzhou. An essential spatial condition stimulating dynamic street life is found to be the open grid network structure with the mixture of diverse commercial, cultural and public programs widely dispersed on street frontages. The proliferation of groundfloor small businesses at the perimeters of neighborhoods in Tongzhou constitutes a big part of the street life, especially for the areas near public transport stations. As a top-down planned town, Almere excels at effective planning control and responsible social considerations, which benefits the long-term well-being of the city. Good urban governance is reflected not only in the public provisions and city marketing, but more importantly, in the quality of the public services and the available opportunities of citizen participation. For example, adaptable architectural design and bottom-up
机译:建设新城镇似乎是一种合理的区域化方法,可以缓解负担过重的大城市的压力。该策略是在20世纪中叶在西欧制定的。自1990年代以来,欧洲新城模式已在中国广泛实施。然而,作者质疑大规模,仓促的新城镇发展的可行性。对全球新城镇经验(尤其是欧洲和中国案例)的研究表明,许多新城镇实际上很难获得真正的城市品质和活力感。迄今为止,很少有研究项目可以评估和开发针对此问题的解决方案。因此,本研究项目的目的是确定促进新城镇城市活力发展的空间和非空间因素及条件。目的是揭示空间设计,城市规划和治理方法对中国和荷兰新市镇当地城市生活的程度和模式的影响。该研究项目的知识不仅有助于更好地理解新市镇的主要问题,而且有助于发展空间战略,以期使新市镇和其他类型的(郊区)地区更加活跃。通过文献综述和案例研究来解决中心研究问题。文献综述对新城镇模型的科学验证进行了批判性的重新评估,尤其是从经济角度而言,城镇自给自足的概念。研究的相关理论主要包括区域科学和经济地理。文献综述还阐明了城市活力的一般定义及其在两个社会不同社会经济和政治背景下的不同含义,建立了定量测量方法,并确定了空间因素和条件的初步框架。事实证明,城市活力的关键指标是人们的共同存在以及公共场所的社会,文化和经济活动。主要条件分为吸引子决定论,空间决定论和人决定论。关于空间因素,重点是街道网络的空间配置,城市街区和街区的组成以及小规模细节的价值。非空间因素主要包括不断变化的城市规划和治理方法。规划和控制的系统方法以及决策权的下放对该主题尤为重要。得出各种城市活力评估标准,然后在比较案例研究中进行应用和测试。荷兰新镇阿尔梅勒和中国新镇通州在各自地区都是重要的新镇。选择它们的依据是计划和市场驱动的,自组织的新城镇的鲜明特征,以及由此产生的城市活力水平和特征的差异。人们认为,他们的政府可以从彼此的经验中汲取灵感,以促进城镇的未来发展。案例研究的关键分析方法是将自上而下的社会空间分析的多层与自下而上的实地调查的实际空间使用重叠。空间分析的重点是发现计划内和计划外社会经济活动的分布与不同尺度上不同要素的空间配置之间的关系。空间语法被用作关键分析工具之一。现场研究任务包括通过静态快照方法记录人们的流动,自组织小型企业,活动和空间拨款的映射,以及对城市官员,当地居民和商店所有者进行采访和调查。比较案例研究的结果表明,空间与新市镇的社会经济生活之间存在很强的相关性。作为以市场为导向的自发性新市镇,街道是通州开展社会经济活动的重要场所。人们发现,刺激街道生活动态的基本空间条件是开放式网格网络结构,其中各种商业,文化和公共项目的组合广泛散布在街道正面。通州社区周边地上小企业的泛滥是街头生活的重要组成部分,尤其是在公共交通车站附近。作为自上而下的计划城镇,阿尔梅勒(Almere)擅长于有效的计划控制和负责任的社会考虑,这有益于该城市的长远福祉。良好的城市治理不仅体现在公共设施和城市营销上,而且更重要的是,体现在公共服务的质量和公民参与的机会上。例如,适应性强的建筑设计和自下而上的

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号