首页> 外文期刊>Contemporary Engineering Sciences >Statistical significance between student motivation, traditional teaching and problem-based learning strategy
【24h】

Statistical significance between student motivation, traditional teaching and problem-based learning strategy

机译:学生动机,传统教学和基于问题的学习策略之间的统计显着性

获取原文
           

摘要

The association between student motivation, traditional teaching and problem-based learning was analyzed in 950 students of the engineering programs of the University of Cartagena between 2014 and 2016. The motivation was evaluated using the instrument designed by Lindner et al (1993) called "Inventory of Self-Regulation of Learning" (Cronbach's Alpha = 0.90). The academic teaching strategy:Problem-based learning was assessed using two (2) questionnaires.The first one evaluates the sessions of the Learning based on problems,tutor-student related to the evaluation of student performance in tutorial sessions. This instrument was validated by Valle et. al (1999) in Martínez (2007) (Cronbach's Alpha = 0.96), the second, evaluates the students' perception of their tutor through the evaluation scale of essential elements of tutor performance, designed by Dolmans, Wolfghagen and Snellen Belendong (1994) (Cronbach's Alpha = 0.87), which evaluates the tutor's performance and competence. The traditional teaching strategy was evaluated using the CEMEDEPU questionnaire designed and validated by Gargallo et. al (2011) which was modified for the research requirements and validated by Alfa de Cronbach which yielded a value of 0.87. For the relationship analysis, the variables were crossed and the bar diagrams and the 2x2 contingency tables were constructed applying the Chi-Square independence test. The results indicate that there is a significant degree of statistical significance (p <0.05) between student motivation and problem-based learning strategy (p = 0.024) at a confidence level of 95%.
机译:在2014年至2016年间,对卡塔赫纳大学工程专业的950名学生进行了学生动机,传统教学和基于问题的学习之间的联系分析。动机由Lindner等人(1993年)设计的“库存自我调节”(Cronbach的Alpha = 0.90)。学术教学策略:使用两(2)个问卷对基于问题的学习进行评估。第一个问卷是根据问题评估学习课程的,与学生在辅导课中评估表现有关的师生。该仪器已通过Valle等人的验证。 al(1999)在Martínez(2007)(Cronbach's Alpha = 0.96)中,第二部分通过由Dolmans,Wolfghagen和Snellen Belendong(1994)设计的导师绩效基本要素的评估量表来评估学生对导师的感知。克伦巴赫(Cronbach)的Alpha = 0.87),它评估了导师的表现和能力。传统的教学策略是使用Gargallo等人设计和验证的CEMEDEPU问卷进行评估的。等人(2011年),根据研究要求进行了修改,并由Alfa de Cronbach进行了验证,得出的值为0.87。为了进行关系分析,使用卡方独立性检验对变量进行交叉,并绘制条形图和2x2列联表。结果表明,在95%的置信度下,学生动机和基于问题的学习策略之间的统计学显着性(p <0.05)(p = 0.024)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号