首页> 外文期刊>Clinical ophthalmology >Comparison of visual outcomes and subjective visual quality after bilateral implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens and blended implantation of apodized diffractive bifocal intraocular lenses
【24h】

Comparison of visual outcomes and subjective visual quality after bilateral implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens and blended implantation of apodized diffractive bifocal intraocular lenses

机译:双侧衍射三焦点人工晶状体双眼植入和切趾衍射双焦点人工晶状体混合植入后的视觉结果和主观视觉质量的比较

获取原文
       

摘要

Purpose: To compare the visual acuity (VA) and quality of vision between bilateral implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) and blended bifocal IOLs with an intermediate add in the dominant eye and a near add in the nondominant eye. Patients and methods: Patients with either trifocal or blended bifocal IOLs implanted were recruited after surgery. Subjects returned for a single diagnostic visit between 3 and 24 months after surgery. VA was tested at various distances, including low-contrast acuity and acuity at their preferred reading distance. A binocular defocus curve was obtained, and subjective visual function and quality of vision were evaluated. Results: Twenty-five trifocal subjects and 30 blended bifocal subjects were enrolled. There were no significant differences in low-contrast acuity, preferred reading distance, or acuity at that reading distance. Binocular vision at 4 m, 60 cm, and 40 cm was not statistically significantly different. The trifocal provided statistically significantly better visual acuity ( P <0.05) at vergences from -0.5 to -1.5 D (from 2 m to 67 cm viewing distance, P <0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the near vision subscale scores of the 39-question National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire or the overall scores of the Quality of Vision questionnaire, though significantly more trifocal subjects reported that the observed visual disturbances were “bothersome” ( P <0.05). Conclusion: Both lens modalities provided subjects with excellent binocular near and distance vision, with similar low rates of visual disturbances and good reported functional vision. The trifocal IOL provided significantly better intermediate VA in the viewing distance range of 2 m to 67 cm, corresponding to viewing things such as a car dashboard or grocery shelf. VA was similar between groups at viewing distances from 60 to 40 cm, corresponding to computer or reading distance.
机译:目的:比较三焦点人工晶状体(IOL)和混合双焦点IOL的双眼植入的视力(VA)和视力质量,在优势眼中有中等加重,在非优势眼中有近加。患者和方法:术后植入三焦点或混合双焦点IOL的患者。受试者在手术后3至24个月内返回进行一次诊断性就诊。在各种距离下对VA进行了测试,包括低对比度敏锐度和首选阅读距离的敏锐度。获得了双眼散焦曲线,并评估了主观视觉功能和视觉质量。结果:招募了25名三焦点受试者和30名混合双焦点受试者。低对比度敏锐度,首选阅读距离或该阅读距离的敏锐度没有显着差异。在4 m,60 cm和40 cm处的双眼视力没有统计学差异。从-0.5到-1.5 D(从2 m到67 cm的可视距离,P <0.05)的发散度,三焦点提供了统计学上显着更好的视敏度(P <0.05)。 39个问题的美国国家眼科学院视觉功能问卷的近视次级量表得分或视觉质量问卷的总体得分在统计学上无显着差异,尽管更多的三焦点受试者报告观察到的视觉障碍“令人讨厌”( P <0.05)。结论:这两种晶状体模式都为受试者提供了出色的双目近距和远距视力,相似的低视力障碍率和良好的功能性视觉报道。三焦点IOL在2 m至67 cm的可视距离范围内提供了明显更好的中间VA,对应于诸如汽车仪表盘或杂货架等可视物体。在60至40 cm的观看距离(对应于计算机或阅读距离)之间,两组之间的VA相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号