...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical and Translational Allergy >Food allergy in the Netherlands: differences in clinical severity, causative foods, sensitization and DBPCFC between community and outpatients
【24h】

Food allergy in the Netherlands: differences in clinical severity, causative foods, sensitization and DBPCFC between community and outpatients

机译:荷兰的食物过敏:社区和门诊病人在临床严重程度,致病性食物,致敏性和DBPCFC方面的差异

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background It is unknown whether food allergy (FA) in an unselected population is comparable to those from an outpatient clinic population. Objective To discover if FA in a random sample from the Dutch community is comparable to that of outpatients. Methods This study was part of the Europrevall-project. A random sample of 6600 adults received a questionnaire. Those with symptoms to one of 24 defined priority foods were tested for sIgE. Participants with a positive case history and elevated sIgE were evaluated by double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC). Outpatients with a suspicion of FA were evaluated by questionnaire, sIgE and DBPCFC. Results In the community, severe symptoms were reported less often than in outpatients (39.3% vs. 54.3%). Participants in the community were less commonly sensitized to any of the foods. When selecting only those with a probable FA (i.e. symptoms of priority food and elevation of sIgE to the respective food), no major differences were observed with respect to severity, causative foods, sensitization and DBPCFC between the groups. Conclusion In the Netherlands, there are large differences in self-reported FA between community and outpatients. However, Dutch community and outpatients with a probable FA do not differ with respect to severity, causative foods, sensitization and DBPCFC-outcome.
机译:背景技术未知人群中的食物过敏(FA)是否可与门诊患者的食物过敏相媲美。目的发现来自荷兰社区的随机样本中的FA是否与门诊患者相当。方法该研究是Europrevall项目的一部分。随机抽取6600名成人样本进行了问卷调查。那些有24种已定义优先食品之一症状的人进行了sIgE检测。通过双盲安慰剂对照食物激发(DBPCFC)评估了病例史阳性和sIgE升高的参与者。通过问卷,sIgE和DBPCFC对怀疑患有FA的门诊患者进行评估。结果在社区,严重症状的报告频率低于门诊患者(39.3%对54.3%)。社区中的参与者对任何食物的敏感度均较低。当仅选择那些具有可能的FA的食物(即优先食物的症状和相应食物的sIgE升高)时,两组之间在严重程度,致病性食物,致敏性和DBPCFC方面没有观察到主要差异。结论在荷兰,社区和门诊患者之间自我报告的FA差异很大。但是,在可能的FA中,荷兰社区和门诊患者在严重程度,致病性食物,致敏性和DBPCFC结果方面没有差异。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号