首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Interventions in Aging >Prognostic abilities of different calculation formulas for the glomerular filtration rate in elderly Chinese patients with coronary artery disease
【24h】

Prognostic abilities of different calculation formulas for the glomerular filtration rate in elderly Chinese patients with coronary artery disease

机译:中国老年冠心病患者不同肾小球滤过率计算公式的预后能力

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: As a standard indicator of renal function, the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is vital for the prognostic analysis of elderly patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Thus, the search for the calculation equation of GFR with the best prognostic ability is an important task. The most commonly used Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation and the Chinese version (CMDRD) of the MDRD equation has many shortcomings. The newly developed Mayo Clinic quadratic (Mayo) and Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations may overcome these shortcomings. Because the populations involved in these equation-related studies are almost completely devoid of subjects > 70 years of age, there are more debates on the performance of these equations in the elderly. This study was designed to compare the prognostic abilities of different calculation formulas for the GFR in elderly Chinese patients with CAD.Methods: This study included 1050 patients (≥60 years of age) with CAD. The endpoint was all-cause mortality over a mean follow-up period of 417 days.Results: The median age was 86 years (60–104 years). The median values for the MDRD-GFR, CMDRD-GFR, CKD-EPI-GFR, and Mayo-GFR were 66.0, 69.2, 65.6, and 75.8 mL/minute/1.73 m2, respectively. The prevalence of GFR < 60 mL/minute/1.73 m2 based on these measures was 39.3%, 35.4%, 43.0%, and 28.7%, respectively. Their area under the curve values for predicting death were 0.611, 0.610, 0.625, and 0.632, respectively. Their cut-off points for predicting death were 54.1, 53.5, 48.0, and 57.4 mL/minute/1.73 m2, respectively. Compared with the MDRD-GFR, the net reclassification improvement values of the CMDRD-GFR, CKD-EPI-GFR, and Mayo-GFR were 0.02, 0.10, and 0.14, respectively.Conclusion: The prognostic abilities of the CKD-EPI and Mayo equations were significantly superior to the MDRD and CMDRD equations; the Mayo equation had a mild, but not statistically significant superiority compared with the CKD-EPI equation in elderly Chinese patients with CAD.
机译:目的:肾小球滤过率(GFR)作为肾功能的标准指标,对老年冠心病(CAD)患者的预后分析至关重要。因此,寻找具有最佳预后能力的GFR的计算方程是一项重要的任务。肾脏疾病饮食中最常用的修改(MDRD)公式和MDRD公式的中文版本(CMDRD)有很多缺点。新开发的Mayo Clinic二次方(Mayo)和慢性肾脏病(CKD)流行病学协作(CKD-EPI)公式可以克服这些缺点。由于参与这些方程式相关研究的人群几乎完全没有70岁以上的受试者,因此关于老年人中这些方程式性能的争论越来越多。本研究旨在比较中国老年CAD患者不同GFR计算公式的预后能力。方法:本研究纳入1050例(≥60岁)CAD患者。终点为平均417天的全因死亡率。结果:中位年龄为86岁(60-104岁)。 MDRD-GFR,CMDRD-GFR,CKD-EPI-GFR和Mayo-GFR的中值分别为66.0、69.2、65.6和75.8 mL / min / 1.73 m2。根据这些方法,GFR的患病率分别<60 mL / min / 1.73 m2,分别为39.3%,35.4%,43.0%和28.7%。它们在预测死亡的曲线值下的面积分别为0.611、0.610、0.625和0.632。他们预测死亡的临界点分别为54.1、53.5、48.0和57.4 mL / min / 1.73 m2。与MDRD-GFR相比,CMDRD-GFR,CKD-EPI-GFR和Mayo-GFR的净重分类改善值分别为0.02、0.10和0.14。结论:CKD-EPI和Mayo的预后能力方程明显优于MDRD和CMDRD方程;与中国老年人CAD患者的CKD-EPI方程相比,Mayo方程具有优越性,但无统计学意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号