首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Interventions in Aging >Is diabetes mellitus associated with clinical outcomes in aging males treated with transurethral resection of prostate for bladder outlet obstruction: implications from Taiwan Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study
【24h】

Is diabetes mellitus associated with clinical outcomes in aging males treated with transurethral resection of prostate for bladder outlet obstruction: implications from Taiwan Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study

机译:经膀胱尿道经尿道前列腺切除术治疗的老年男性糖尿病与临床结局是否相关:台湾全国人群队列研究的意义

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose: We assessed the lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTSs) and clinical outcomes between diabetes mellitus (DM) patients and non-diabetic (non-DM) patients receiving transurethral resection of prostate (TUR-P). Methods: This analysis was a retrospective cohort study using 13?years (2000–2012) of claims data from Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD). A total of 4,887 patients who had persistent LUTSs and underwent TUR-P for prostate enlargement (benign prostate enlargement [BPE]) were enrolled and divided into two groups: DM and non-DM groups. The patients’ characteristics, postoperative clinical outcomes, and the medication records after TUR-P were compared. Chi-square test was used for categorical variables and independent samples t -test for continuous variables. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to compare the risk of postoperative outcomes. Finally, we estimated the medication-free survival rate after TUR-P using Kaplan–Meier method and compared it between study groups using log-rank test. Results: DM group patients had a higher prevalence of comorbidities. Postoperatively, the DM group had lower rates of urinary tract infection (UTI; odds ratio [OR], 0.78; P =0.009) and higher rates of urinary retention requiring catheterization (OR, 1.35; P =0.01) within 1?month after TUR-P. A higher proportion of patients with DM took anti-muscarinics (OR, 1.23; P =0.032) within the first 3?months and α-blockers (OR, 1.18; P =0.049) during 3–12?months after receiving TUR-P. Overall, the DM group patients had a worse postoperative medication-free survival compared to that of non-DM group patients (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.14; P =0.005). Conclusion: DM patients require higher rates of continuing medication after TUR-P, especially anti-muscarinics in 3?months postoperatively and alpha-blocker after 3?months postoperatively. DM patients also had higher incidence of urine retention after surgery. DM patients had relatively poor treatment outcomes compared to DM-free patients.
机译:目的:我们评估了接受经尿道前列腺电切术(TUR-P)的糖尿病(DM)患者和非糖尿病(non-DM)患者之间的下尿路症状(LUTS)和临床结局。方法:这项分析是一项回顾性队列研究,使用了台湾国家健康保险研究数据库(NHIRD)的13年(2000-2012年)的理赔数据。共有4887例患有持续性LUTS并接受TUR-P前列腺增大(良性前列腺增大[BPE])的患者入选,分为DM组和非DM组。比较了患者的特征,术后临床结局以及TUR-P后的用药记录。卡方检验用于分类变量,独立样本t检验用于连续变量。多变量逻辑回归分析用于比较术后结果的风险。最后,我们使用Kaplan–Meier方法估算了TUR-P后无药生存率,并使用对数秩检验比较了研究组之间的无药生存率。结果:DM组患者合并症的患病率较高。 DM组术后TUR后1个月内尿路感染发生率较低(UTI;优势比[OR]为0.78; P = 0.009),尿retention留率较高,需要进行导管插入(OR为1.35; P = 0.01)。 -P在接受TUR-P后的前3个月内,较高比例的DM患者服用抗毒蕈碱药(OR,1.23; P = 0.032),而在3-12个月内服用α受体阻滞剂(OR,1.18; P = 0.049)。 。总体而言,与非DM组患者相比,DM组患者的术后无药物生存期更差(95%置信区间[95%CI],1.14; P = 0.005)。结论:DM患者在TUR-P术后需要更高的持续用药率,尤其是术后3个月使用抗毒蕈碱药物和术后3个月使用α受体阻滞剂。 DM患者手术后尿retention留的发生率也更高。与无DM患者相比,DM患者的治疗结果相对较差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号