...
首页> 外文期刊>Ciencia Rural >Biomechanical analisis ex vivo of two osteosynthesis methods for transversal diaphiseal fracture in canine femur
【24h】

Biomechanical analisis ex vivo of two osteosynthesis methods for transversal diaphiseal fracture in canine femur

机译:两种骨合成方法对犬股骨横行横突骨折的生物力学分析

获取原文
           

摘要

> size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">The aim of this study was to compare ex vivo, in 12 pars of bone, the axial compression and bending strength of two transversal diaphiseal fracture reducing devices in canine femur of dogs weighting 5 to 10kg. One method using two intramedullary pins of Steinmann 2.0mm diameter, and the other using cortical internal transfixator with two intramedullary pins of Steinmann 2.0mm diameter, which posteriorly turned-up around the bone like a splint and fixed with surgeon wire cerclage 0.6mm diameter, to fix them. The fractured and stabilized bones, after the fragments reduction, were put on test under the strength of a Soloteste® press, where the ones from group G2 (internal skelethic transfixation) presented a statistically significant superiority of the fixation device stiffness in relation to those from group G1 (intramedullary pin).
机译:> size =“ 2” face =“ Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif”>此研究的目的是比较12个骨骼中的离体,轴向两只5至10kg的犬股骨横trans骨骨折复位装置的抗压强度和弯曲强度。一种方法是使用两个直径为2.0mm的Steinmann髓内钉,另一种方法是使用带有两个直径为2.0mm的Steinmann髓内钉的皮质内固定器,其后部像夹板一样向后翻转,并用直径为0.6mm的外科医生钢丝环扎修复它们。骨折复位后,将骨折并稳定的骨头在Soloteste ®压力机的力量下进行测试,其中G2组(内部骨骼固定)在统计学上具有明显的优越性设备刚度相对于G1组(内钉)的刚度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号