首页> 外文期刊>Chiropractic and Manual Therapies >US chiropractors’ attitudes, skills and use of evidence-based practice: A cross-sectional national survey
【24h】

US chiropractors’ attitudes, skills and use of evidence-based practice: A cross-sectional national survey

机译:美国脊医的态度,技巧和基于证据的做法的使用:全国性横断面调查

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Evidence based practice (EBP) is being increasingly utilized by health care professionals as a means of improving the quality of health care. The introduction of EBP principles into the chiropractic profession is a relatively recent phenomenon. There is currently a lack of information about the EBP literacy level of US chiropractors and the barriers/facilitators to the use of EBP in the chiropractic profession. Methods A nationwide EBP survey of US chiropractors was administered online (Nov 2012-Mar 2013) utilizing a validated self-report instrument (EBASE) in which three sub-scores are reported: attitudes, skills and use. Means, medians, and frequency distributions for each of the sub-scores were generated. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the demographic characteristics of the sample. Means and proportions were calculated for all of the responses to each of the questions in the survey. Results A total of 1,314 US chiropractors completed the EBASE survey; the sample appeared to be representative of the US chiropractic profession. Respondents were predominantly white (94.3%), male (75%), 47 (+/? 11.6) years of age, and in practice for more than 10?years (60%). EBASE sub-score means (possible ranges) were: attitudes, 31.4 (8–40); skills, 44.3 (13–65); and use, 10.3 (0–24). Survey participants generally held favorable attitudes toward EBP, but reported less use of EBP. A minority of participants indicated that EBP coursework (17%) and critical thinking (29%) were a major part of their chiropractic education. The most commonly reported barrier to the use of EBP was “lack of time”. Almost 90% of the sample indicated that they were interested in improving their EBP skills. Conclusion American chiropractors appear similar to chiropractors in other countries, and other health professionals regarding their favorable attitudes towards EBP, while expressing barriers related to EBP skills such as research relevance and lack of time. This suggests that the design of future EBP educational interventions should capitalize on the growing body of EBP implementation research developing in other health disciplines. This will likely include broadening the approach beyond a sole focus on EBP education, and taking a multilevel approach that also targets professional, organizational and health policy domains.
机译:背景技术医护专业人员越来越多地采用循证实践(EBP)作为改善医护质量的手段。将EBP原理引入脊椎治疗界是一种相对较新的现象。当前缺乏有关美国脊医的EBP素养水平以及在脊医界使用EBP的障碍/促进者的信息。方法使用经验证的自我报告工具(EBASE)在线(美国2012年11月至2013年3月)对美国脊医进行EBP全国调查,其中报告了三个子评分:态度,技能和使用情况。生成每个子得分的平均值,中位数和频率分布。描述性统计数据用于分析样本的人口统计特征。计算出对调查中每个问题的所有回答的均值和比例。结果共有1,314名美国脊医完成了EBASE调查。该样本似乎代表了美国脊骨疗法专业。受访者主要是白人(94.3%),男性(75%),47岁(+/- 11.6)岁,实际上超过10岁(60%)。 EBASE子分数平均值(可能的范围)是:态度31.4(8-40);技能,44.3(13–65);并使用10.3(0-24)。调查参与者总体上对EBP持积极态度,但报告称对EBP的使用较少。少数参与者表示,EBP课程工作(17%)和批判性思维(29%)是他们的脊骨疗法教育的主要部分。据报道,使用EBP的最常见障碍是“时间紧缺”。几乎90%的样本表明他们有兴趣提高自己的EBP技能。结论美国脊医在其对EBP的态度方面与其他国家的脊医和其他卫生专业人员相似,同时也表达了与EBP技能相关的障碍,例如研究相关性和时间不足。这表明,未来的EBP教育干预措施的设计应利用在其他卫生学科中不断发展的EBP实施研究机构。这将可能包括将方法扩展到仅专注于EBP教育之外,并采取针对专业,组织和卫生政策领域的多层次方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号