首页> 外文期刊>Chrismed Journal of Health and Research >Comparative evaluation of four different sterilization methods on contaminated endodontic files
【24h】

Comparative evaluation of four different sterilization methods on contaminated endodontic files

机译:四种不同消毒方法对污染的牙髓锉的比较评估

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: The reuse of instruments in the field of endodontics leads to cross infection due to contamination with microbes as the instruments come into direct contact with saliva, blood, and infected tissues. Since microbes are considered to be the major cause of endodontic failures, sterilization of endodontic instruments is mandatory for maintaining asepsis to prevent cross-contamination from one person to other. Hence, the present study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of four different methods of sterilizing contaminated endodontic files. Materials and Methods: A total of 48 stainless steel K files were divided into four groups based on the sterilization method followed – Group A: Autoclave, Group B: Glass bead sterilization, Group C: Glutaraldehyde, and Group D: Quitanet Plus (aldehyde-free solution). In all the tested groups, half of the files were contaminated with Escherichia coli and remaining with Enterococcus faecalis. Then, presterilization colony counts were recorded, followed by sterilization through respective methods. Later, the sterilized files were rinsed with distilled water and 100 ul of the diluted concentration was transferred and cultured onto the respective agar plates to determine the total microbial reduction. Results: Autoclave showed complete effectiveness in reducing the microbial count followed by Quitanet Plus, glass bead sterilizer, and glutaraldehyde. Conclusion: Autoclave is considered to be the best sterilization technique to prevent cross infection in endodontic therapy.
机译:背景:在牙髓治疗领域中重复使用器械会导致交叉感染,这是由于器械直接接触唾液,血液和受感染的组织而受到微生物的污染。由于微生物被认为是牙髓治疗失败的主要原因,因此必须对牙髓器械进行灭菌以保持无菌状态,以防止一个人与另一个人发生交叉污染。因此,进行本研究以比较对污染的牙髓锉消毒的四种不同方法的有效性。材料和方法:根据以下灭菌方法,将总共48个不锈钢K锉分为四组:A组:高压灭菌器,B组:玻璃珠灭菌,C组:戊二醛,D组:Quitanet Plus(醛-免费解决方案)。在所有测试组中,一半的文件被大肠杆菌污染,其余的被粪肠球菌污染。然后,记录灭菌前的菌落数,然后通过各种方法进行灭菌。之后,用蒸馏水冲洗消毒后的文件,然后转移100ul的稀释浓度,并在各自的琼脂平板上培养以确定总的微生物减少量。结果:高压灭菌器在减少微生物数量方面表现出完全的有效性,其次是Quitanet Plus,玻璃珠灭菌器和戊二醛。结论:高压灭菌器被认为是预防牙髓治疗中交叉感染的最佳灭菌技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号