...
首页> 外文期刊>Advances in Life Science and Technology >The Effectiveness of Three Different Methods for Sterilization of the Endodontic Files (An in Vitro Study)
【24h】

The Effectiveness of Three Different Methods for Sterilization of the Endodontic Files (An in Vitro Study)

机译:三种不同方法对牙髓锉进行灭菌的功效(体外研究)

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background : Sterilization is the procedure by which all the vegetative or sport state microorganisms’ threats are countered. The main aim of sterilization in the health care field is to eradicate the spread of existing infectious diseases and preventing any new infections. In dentistry, it primarily relates to reuse of instruments to prevent cross-infection and ensure optimal dental care. The complex miniature architecture of endodontic files makes cleaning and sterilization difficult, and some professionals have suggested single use for these instruments. Aim: The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of different methods of sterilization for endodontic instruments: Autoclaving without a plastic bag, Autoclaving with a plastic bag, CO 2 laser, Diode laser, and Glass- bead sterilization. Material and Methods : The study was performed on 60 endodontic K-files, 21 mm long and size 5o, divided into 6 groups, 10 for each, the first group were considered as control. The files contaminated with a homogenous spore suspension of Bacillus thuringiensis . Then, the contaminated files of the 6 groups sterilized by different sterilization methods: Autoclave, Autoclave with a plastic bag, glass-bead, Diode laser, and CO 2 laser. The sterilized files washed in 5ml of normal saline and then 0.1ml suspended solution powered in 8cm Petridis of nutrient agar and number of well isolated colonies were counted after 24 hours of incubation at 37 oC. Results : The study showed that the files sterilized by autoclave were 99.66 % sterile, while with a plastic bag give a 99.32 %sterile. Those sterilized by glass-bead were96.74 % sterile and those with CO 2 laser were 93.85 %, and diode lasers were 84.24 % sterile. Statistical analysis of all sterilized groups showed a statistical significant difference between groups regarding their sterilization efficiency. Comparison of the sterilized groups with the control group about their efficacies in sterilization showed that the difference was statistically significant. Conclusion : Autoclave, with or without bag, is considered the best sterilizing technique. To achieve one hundred percent of sterilization the time of autoclave must be suitable to allow the killing of all microorganisms. For faster sterilization other methods could be used but with less effectiveness. Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of three methods for sterilization of endodontic instruments: Autoclaving (with plastic bags and without), laser sterilization (CO 2 and diode laser) and glass-bead sterilization.
机译:背景:灭菌是一种应对所有营养或运动状态微生物威胁的程序。卫生保健领域灭菌的主要目的是消除现有传染病的传播并预防任何新的感染。在牙科领域,它主要涉及器械的重复使用,以防止交叉感染并确保最佳的牙齿护理。牙髓锉的复杂微型结构使清洁和消毒变得困难,一些专业人员建议一次性使用这些器械。目的:本研究的目的是比较不同消毒方法对牙髓器械的有效性:不带塑料袋的高压灭菌,带塑料袋的高压灭菌,CO 2激光,二极管激光和玻璃珠灭菌。材料与方法:研究对象为60例21毫米长,5o大小的牙髓K锉,分为6组,每组10个,第一组为对照组。该文件被苏云金芽孢杆菌的均一孢子悬浮液污染。然后,用不同的灭菌方法对6组受污染的文件进行灭菌:高压灭菌器,带塑料袋的高压灭菌器,玻璃珠,二极管激光器和CO 2激光器。无菌档案用5ml生理盐水洗涤,然后在8cm营养琼脂培养皿中加入0.1ml悬浮液,在37 oC下孵育24小时后,计数分离良好的菌落数。结果:研究表明,用高压灭菌器灭菌的文件无菌率为99.66%,而用塑料袋灭菌的文件为99.32%。玻璃珠灭菌的灭菌率为96.74%,CO 2激光灭菌的为93.85%,二极管激光灭菌的为84.24%。所有灭菌组的统计分析表明,各组之间在灭菌效率方面有统计学差异。比较灭菌组和对照组的灭菌效果,发现差异具有统计学意义。结论:有或没有袋子的高压灭菌器被认为是最佳的灭菌技术。为了实现百分之一百的灭菌,高压灭菌器的时间必须适合于杀死所有微生物。为了更快地灭菌,可以使用其他方法,但效果较差。目的:本研究的目的是研究三种方法对牙髓器械消毒的功效:高压灭菌(带塑料袋和不带塑料袋),激光消毒(CO 2和二极管激光)和玻璃珠消毒。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号