首页> 美国政府科技报告 >The Comparative Efficiency of Four Types of Endodontic Files and Reamers
【24h】

The Comparative Efficiency of Four Types of Endodontic Files and Reamers

机译:四种牙髓锉刀和铰刀的比较效率

获取原文

摘要

Eighty artificial root canals were created in individual sections of bovine bone. Each canal was instrumented to a size 80 using four types of endodontic instruments: Hedstrom files; K-files; reamers; and the new Unifile. Using volume of bone removed per unit of time, the efficiency of instruments was compared. The Hedstrom file proved statistically (p less than .05) to be the most efficient in removing bone from the straight artificial canals.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号