首页> 外文期刊>Biblionline >USAR OU N?O USAR - qual a relevancia das meta tags na recupera??o da informa??o pelos mecanismos de busca?
【24h】

USAR OU N?O USAR - qual a relevancia das meta tags na recupera??o da informa??o pelos mecanismos de busca?

机译:使用还是不使用-元标记在搜索引擎检索信息中的相关性是什么?

获取原文
       

摘要

With the volume of information available on the Web, has the challenge of recovering this material, and literature presents several techniques that can help us in this process, such as use of catalogs, use of logical operators, query databases (metadata ), use of search engines - also known as search engines with specific terms related to the desired subject, or words that can describe the content of the desired page (the keywords), among other existing techniques, thus allowing ease of interface between the user and search engine. Another well-used technique is to use the services of Search Engine Optimization (SEO - optimization service sites for the results of search engines) is to conduct a responsible strategy to improve the presentation of a page available on the Web. The proposal of this work was verify the efficiency of meta tags in information retrieval procedures applied in the electronic journals in information science by search engines. We developed a quantitative survey, which covered the four major search engines, Google, Bing, Yahoo and Ask, where meta tags was inserted in the search engines and query results tabulated and compared. The results of this research show is disturbing, because they contradict what is stated in the literature. Meta tags should have a role in the process of searching for information in an efficient, able to assist the user. However it was found that the use of meta tags were irrelevant to the search results obtained. We concluded then that meta tags is useless on the process of information retrieval through search engines, in the particular case of the sampled magazines researched this, yes. However we should note that the majority found the magazines used the same system and configuration of this may influence the results. Another important issue to note is that the results observed cannot be generalized to other content available on the Web, because there are a set of variables that were not included in this research.
机译:鉴于Web上可用的信息量很大,在恢复这种材料方面面临挑战,文献提供了几种可以在此过程中帮助我们的技术,例如使用目录,使用逻辑运算符,查询数据库(metadata),使用搜索引擎-也称为搜索引擎,具有与所需主题相关的特定术语,或可以描述所需页面内容的单词(关键字),以及其他现有技术,从而使用户和搜索引擎之间的界面变得容易。另一种使用良好的技术是使用搜索引擎优化服务(SEO-用于搜索引擎结果的优化服务站点)来执行负责任的策略,以改善Web上可用页面的呈现方式。这项工作的提议是验证搜索引擎在信息科学电子期刊中应用的信息检索程序中元标记的效率。我们进行了定量调查,涵盖了四个主要搜索引擎:Google,Bing,Yahoo和Ask,其中在搜索引擎中插入了元标记,并将查询结果制成表格并进行了比较。这项研究的结果令人不安,因为它们与文献中所陈述的相矛盾。元标签应在有效地,能够帮助用户的信息搜索过程中发挥作用。但是,发现元标记的使用与所获得的搜索结果无关。然后我们得出结论,在通过搜索引擎进行信息检索的过程中,元标签是无用的,在特定的抽样杂志对此进行了研究的情况下,是的。但是,我们应该注意,大多数人发现杂志使用的是相同的系统,这种配置可能会影响结果。要注意的另一个重要问题是,观察到的结果不能推广到Web上可用的其他内容,因为本研究中未包含一组变量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号