...
首页> 外文期刊>Cardiology Journal >Left ventricular systolic and diastolic function in patients with atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia treated by radiofrequency current ablation
【24h】

Left ventricular systolic and diastolic function in patients with atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia treated by radiofrequency current ablation

机译:射频消融治疗房室结折返性心动过速患者左室收缩和舒张功能

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: The impact of radiofrequency current ablation (RFCA) on left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic function in patients with atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is not well established yet. Methods: The study group consisted of 25 patients (18 W, mean age 43 ± 11) with recurrent episodes of AVRT without any concomitant diseases. The control group was formed of 25 healthy volunteers. In both study and control groups, transthorasic echocardiography (TTE) and Doppler were performed in order to assess LV systolic and diastolic function. In AVNRT syndrome patients, TTE was followed by electrophysiology study and RFCA. TTE was repeated after six months in the study group. Results: Significant differences were found between the study and control groups with regard to LV systolic (FS - fractional shortening: 37 ± 4 vs. 42 ± 6%, p = 0.001; ESV - end-systolic volume: 19 ± 4 vs. 17 ± 4 ml/m2, p = 0.03; EF - ejection fraction: 55 ± 5 vs. 62 ± 4%, p = = 0.001) and diastolic function (E wave: 69 ± 17 vs. 84 ± 15 cm/s, p = 0.002; E/A: 1.09 ± ± 0.42 vs. 1.38 ± 0.27, p = 0.005; DT - duration difference between A and AR waves: 7 ± 29 vs. -28 ± 13 ms, p = 0.001; DT - deceleration time of E wave: 223 ± 34 vs. 177 ± 27 ms, p = 0.001; IVRT - isovolumic relaxation time: 105 ± 15 vs. 86 ± 11 ms, p = 0.001; E/A while Valsalva manoeuvre: 0.93 ± 0.35 vs. 1.25 ± 0.16, p = 0.001; AR - atrial reversal velocity: 27 ± 7 vs. 14 ± 11 cm/s, p = 0.001) variables. In 6-month follow-up decrease in LVESV (19 ± 4 vs. 17 ± 4 ml, p vs. 62 ± 4%, p vs. 79 ± 20 cm/s, p vs. 1.30 ± 0.27, p vs. 63 ± 10 cm/s, p vs. 179 ± 22 ms, p vs. 89 ± 11 ms, p vs. -13 ± 28 ms, p Conclusions: Successful RFCA of slow atrioventricular conduction pathway in patients with AVNRT and AVRT results in improvement of LV systolic and diastolic function. (Cardiol J 2008; 15: 150-155)
机译:背景:房室结折返性心动过速(AVNRT)患者的射频消融(RFCA)对左心室(LV)收缩和舒张功能的影响尚未确定。方法:研究组由25例(18 W,平均年龄43±11)的复发性AVRT发作而无任何伴随疾病的患者组成。对照组由25名健康志愿者组成。在研究和对照组中,均进行了经胸超声心动图(TTE)和多普勒检查,以评估LV的收缩和舒张功能。对于AVNRT综合征患者,TTE之后是电生理研究和RFCA。在研究组六个月后重复进行TTE。结果:研究组与对照组之间的LV收缩期存在显着差异(FS-缩短分数:37±4 vs. 42±6%,p = 0.001; ESV-收缩末期体积:19±4 vs. 17 ±4 ml / m 2 ,p = 0.03; EF-射血分数:55±5 vs. 62±4%,p = = 0.001)和舒张功能(E波:69±17 vs. 84±15 cm / s,p = 0.002; E / A:1.09±±0.42 vs. 1.38±0.27,p = 0.005; DT-A和AR波之间的持续时间差:7±29 vs -28±13 ms, p = 0.001; DT-E波的减速时间:223±34 vs. 177±27 ms,p = 0.001; IVRT-等容弛豫时间:105±15 vs. 86±11 ms,p = 0.001; E / A Valsalva动作:0.93±0.35 vs. 1.25±0.16,p = 0.001; AR-心房逆转速度:27±7 vs. 14±11 cm / s,p = 0.001)变量。在6个月的随访中LVESV下降(19±4 vs. 17±4 ml,p vs. 62±4%,p vs. 79±20 cm / s,p vs.1.30±0.27,p vs. 63 ±10 cm / s,p vs. 179±22 ms,p vs. 89±11 ms,p vs. -13±28 ms,p结论:AVNRT和AVRT患者房室传导通路慢的成功RFCA可以改善左室收缩和舒张功能的变化(Cardiol J 2008; 15:150-155)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号