...
首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Medicine and Medical Research >Comparison of Fentanyl Citrate-midazolampropofol and Fentanyl Citrate-ketamine Propofol Combinations with Regards to Efficiency and Safety in Sedation Practices for the ERCP
【24h】

Comparison of Fentanyl Citrate-midazolampropofol and Fentanyl Citrate-ketamine Propofol Combinations with Regards to Efficiency and Safety in Sedation Practices for the ERCP

机译:芬太尼柠檬酸咪达唑仑丙泊酚和芬太尼柠檬酸氯胺酮丙胺酚丙泊酚组合在ERCP镇静实践中的效率和安全性比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Aims: The objective of our study is to compare the efficiency and safety of fentanyl citrate-midazolam-propofol combination with fentanyl citrate-ketamine-propofol combination used as sedative and analgesic medication in patients undergoing ERCP procedure. Study Design: Randomized and prospective. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation (Gastroenterology Unit) between June 2009 and June 2010. Methodology: 103 patients undergoing ERCP aged between 20-80 years, ASA I-III, participated in our study. Cases were randomly divided into two groups as group M(n=51) and group K(n=52). Fentanyl citrate 1 μg/kg IV was infused to all patients 5 minutes before the process. Group M: In addition to fentanyl, midazolam 0.04 mg/kg IV and propofol loading dose of 1mg/kg IV and maintenance dose of 4mg/kg/h IV were also infused. Group K: In addition to fentanyl, ketamine 0.5mg/kg IV and propofol loading dose of 1mg/kg IV and maintenance dose of 4mg/kg/h IV were infused as well. At the end of ERCP procedure, propofol infusion was terminated. The time required for the Richmond Alertness-Sedation Scale (RASS) score to reach -1 (recovery period) and its change from -1 to 0 in recovery room (discharge period) and also the development of side effects during the practice were recorded. After recovery period the patients were questioned if they felt pain during the procedure or not. If they felt any, the pain was evaluated according to Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score. Results: Recovery period, discharge period and satisfaction of the endoscopist were similar between the two groups, however cardiovascular and respiratory system parameters were more stable in patients in Group K. Conclusion: Our study pointed that fentanyl citrate-ketamine-propofol combination is probably preferable over fentanyl citrate-midazolam-propofol combination in terms of cardiovascular and respiratory stability during sedation in ERCP procedures.
机译:目的:我们的研究目的是比较枸CP酸芬太尼-咪达唑仑-丙泊酚联合芬太尼柠檬酸-氯胺酮-丙泊酚联合作为镇静和镇痛药物对接受ERCP手术的患者的有效性和安全性。研究设计:随机和前瞻性。研究的地点和持续时间:2009年6月至2010年6月间,麻醉与复活学系(消化内科)。方法:103例年龄在20-80岁之间的ASA I-III的ERCP患者参加了我们的研究。将病例随机分为两组,分别为M组(n = 51)和K组(n = 52)。在手术前5分钟向所有患者输注1μg/ kg柠檬酸芬太尼。 M组:除芬太尼外,还输注咪达唑仑0.04 mg / kg IV和异丙酚负荷剂量1mg / kg IV和维持剂量4mg / kg / h IV。 K组:除芬太尼外,还输注氯胺酮0.5mg / kg静脉和异丙酚负荷剂量1mg / kg静脉和维持剂量4mg / kg / h静脉。在ERCP程序结束时,终止了异丙酚输注。记录里士满机敏性-镇静量表(RASS)评分达到-1(恢复期)所需的时间,以及恢复室从-1变为0(出院期)所需的时间,以及练习过程中出现的副作用。恢复期后,询问患者在手术过程中是否感到疼痛。如果他们感到有任何不适,则根据视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分评估疼痛程度。结果:两组的内镜医师的恢复期,出院期和满意程度相似,但K组患者的心血管和呼吸系统参数更稳定。结论:我们的研究指出,枸fen酸芬太尼-氯胺酮-异丙酚组合可能更可取ERCP手术中镇静期间的心血管和呼吸稳定性方面优于柠檬酸芬太尼-咪达唑仑-丙泊酚组合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号