首页> 外文期刊>BMC Pediatrics >Comparison of broad range 16S rDNA PCR and conventional blood culture for diagnosis of sepsis in the newborn: a case control study
【24h】

Comparison of broad range 16S rDNA PCR and conventional blood culture for diagnosis of sepsis in the newborn: a case control study

机译:广泛的16S rDNA PCR与常规血液培养对新生儿败血症诊断的比较:病例对照研究

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background Early onset bacterial sepsis is a feared complication of the newborn. A large proportion of infants admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) for suspected sepsis receive treatment with potent systemic antibiotics while a diagnostic workup is in progress. The gold standard for detecting bacterial sepsis is blood culture. However, as pathogens in blood cultures are only detected in approximately 25% of patients, the sensitivity of blood culture is suspected to be low. Therefore, the diagnosis of sepsis is often based on the development of clinical signs, in combination with laboratory tests such as a rise in C – reactive protein (CRP). Molecular assays for the detection of bacterial DNA in the blood represent possible new diagnostic tools for early identification of a bacterial cause. Methods A broad range 16S rDNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) without preincubation was compared to conventional diagnostic work up for clinical sepsis, including BACTEC blood culture, for early determination of bacterial sepsis in the newborn. In addition, the relationship between known risk factors, clinical signs, and laboratory parameters considered in clinical sepsis in the newborn were explored. Results Forty-eight infants with suspected sepsis were included in this study. Thirty-one patients were diagnosed with sepsis, only 6 of these had a positive blood culture. 16S rDNA PCR analysis of blinded blood samples from the 48 infants revealed 10 samples positive for the presence of bacterial DNA. PCR failed to be positive in 2 samples from blood culture positive infants, and was positive in 1 sample where a diagnosis of a non-septic condition was established. Compared to blood culture the diagnosis of bacterial proven sepsis by PCR revealed a 66.7% sensitivity, 87.5% specificity, 95.4% positive and 75% negative predictive value. PCR combined with blood culture revealed bacteria in 35.1% of the patients diagnosed with sepsis. Irritability and feeding difficulties were the clinical signs most often observed in sepsis. CRP increased in the presence of bacterial infection. Conclusion There is a need for PCR as a method to quickly point out the infants with sepsis. However, uncertainty about a bacterial cause of sepsis was not reduced by the PCR result, reflecting that methodological improvements are required in order for DNA detection to replace or supplement traditional blood culture in diagnosis of bacterial sepsis.
机译:背景技术细菌性败血症的早期发作是新生儿所担心的并发症。在进行诊断检查时,因怀疑脓毒症而进入新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)的婴儿中,有很大一部分接受了有效的全身性抗生素治疗。检测细菌性败血症的金标准是血液培养。但是,由于仅在大约25%的患者中检测到血液培养物中的病原体,因此怀疑血液培养的敏感性较低。因此,败血症的诊断通常基于临床体征的发展,并结合诸如C-反应蛋白(CRP)升高的实验室检查。用于检测血液中细菌DNA的分子测定法代表了可能的新诊断工具,可用于早期识别细菌病因。方法将未经预孵育的广泛16S rDNA聚合酶链反应(PCR)与常规败血症的临床败血症诊断方法(包括BACTEC血液培养)进行比较,以早期确定新生儿细菌性败血症。此外,还探讨了新生儿临床败血症中已知的危险因素,临床体征和实验室参数之间的关系。结果本研究纳入了48名疑似败血症的婴儿。 31名患者被诊断患有败血症,其中只有6名血液培养呈阳性。对48例婴儿的盲血样本的16S rDNA PCR分析显示,有10例样本中细菌DNA呈阳性。在血培养阳性婴儿的2个样本中,PCR均未呈阳性反应;在1个诊断为非败血病的样本中,PCR呈阳性。与血液培养相比,通过PCR对细菌确诊败血症的诊断显示出66.7%的敏感性,87.5%的特异性,95.4%的阳性和75%的阴性预测值。 PCR和血液培养相结合,在诊断为败血症的患者中有35.1%的细菌。易怒和进食困难是败血症中最常见的临床症状。存在细菌感染时,CRP升高。结论需要PCR作为一种快速指出败血症婴儿的方法。但是,PCR结果并未降低有关细菌性败血症的不确定性,这反映出需要进行方法上的改进,以便在检测细菌性败血症时进行DNA检测以替代或补充传统的血液培养。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号